The role of wall slip on soluto-Marangoni instability in inertial two-fluid channel flows: A linear stability analysis

The impact of wall slip on soluto-Marangoni instability in a two-dimensional inertial flow is analyzed using the Orr-Sommerfeld and species transport equations. While previous studies explored similar instability, their scope was limited. This study extends Picardo et al., “Solutal Marangoni instability in layered two-phase flows,” J. Fluid Mech. 793, 280–315 (2016), who considered only no-slip condition, and Agrawal et al., “Impact of wall-slip on the soluto-Marangoni instability in a two-fluid system in a channel–Creeping flow scenario,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow 175, 104813 (2024), who considered wall slips but only for creeping flow. By incorporating wall-slip effects, we examine three scenarios: S1 (slip at the upper wall), S2 (slip at the lower wall), and S1S2 (symmetric slip at both walls). Stability is assessed by identifying unstable and stable regions in the n–m (depth ratio–viscosity ratio) plane through asymptotic analysis of long-wave disturbances. Numerical simulations using the Chebyshev spectral collocation method reveal two distinct modes (M1 and M2), with stability characteristics presented for typical values of the Marangoni number, Reynolds number, n, m, and slip lengths. The exchange of the dominance between inertial and Marangoni stresses under different wall-slip conditions is highlighted through energy budget analysis. Under inertial flow, in a channel with a less viscous fluid adjacent to the upper wall and mass transfer occurs downward, the system becomes unstable at lower Marangoni numbers. In such configurations, S2 slip stabilize both M1 and M2 modes at higher slip lengths. Conversely, for a more viscous upper layer with the same mass transfer direction, S1 slip conditions provide better stability compared to the no-slip condition. The study presents methods for stabilizing or destabilizing inertial channel flow by designing channel walls with appropriate slip conditions for the specific application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0255920
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of wall slip on soluto-Marangoni instability in inertial two-fluid channel flows: A linear stability analysis

Deepu Prabhakaran, Ankur Agrawal, Usha Ranganathan
1 citations
Physics of Fluids
Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films
1.33
article

The role of wall slip on soluto-Marangoni instability in inertial two-fluid channel flows: A linear stability analysis

Deepu Prabhakaran, Ankur Agrawal, Usha Ranganathan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The impact of wall slip on soluto-Marangoni instability in a two-dimensional inertial flow is analyzed using the Orr-Sommerfeld and species transport equations. While previous studies explored similar instability, their scope was limited. This study extends Picardo et al., “Solutal Marangoni instability in layered two-phase flows,” J. Fluid Mech. 793, 280–315 (2016), who considered only no-slip condition, and Agrawal et al., “Impact of wall-slip on the soluto-Marangoni instability in a two-fluid system in a channel–Creeping flow scenario,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow 175, 104813 (2024), who considered wall slips but only for creeping flow. By incorporating wall-slip effects, we examine three scenarios: S1 (slip at the upper wall), S2 (slip at the lower wall), and S1S2 (symmetric slip at both walls). Stability is assessed by identifying unstable and stable regions in the n–m (depth ratio–viscosity ratio) plane through asymptotic analysis of long-wave disturbances. Numerical simulations using the Chebyshev spectral collocation method reveal two distinct modes (M1 and M2), with stability characteristics presented for typical values of the Marangoni number, Reynolds number, n, m, and slip lengths. The exchange of the dominance between inertial and Marangoni stresses under different wall-slip conditions is highlighted through energy budget analysis. Under inertial flow, in a channel with a less viscous fluid adjacent to the upper wall and mass transfer occurs downward, the system becomes unstable at lower Marangoni numbers. In such configurations, S2 slip stabilize both M1 and M2 modes at higher slip lengths. Conversely, for a more viscous upper layer with the same mass transfer direction, S1 slip conditions provide better stability compared to the no-slip condition. The study presents methods for stabilizing or destabilizing inertial channel flow by designing channel walls with appropriate slip conditions for the specific application.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(3)
Indian Institute of Technology Patna (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
Science and Engineering Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.