The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Study of Fundamentalist Methodology

Objectives: The research aims to analyze the methodology of inference in artificial intelligence models and compare it with the curriculum of Islamic fundamentalist schools, and to study the possibility of integration between computer reasoning and jurisprudence. It also seeks to assess the ability of artificial intelligence algorithms to accommodate fundamental rules and legitimate purposes, Propose a methodological framework for employing artificial intelligence techniques in supporting jurisprudence, while maintaining Sharia and ethical standards. Methodology: The research relied on an inductive analytical methodology, as reasoning methodologies in Islamic fundamentalist schools and reasoning mechanisms in artificial intelligence were analyzed separately. The general rules and models extracted from legal texts and modern applications were extrapolated with the aim of providing an integrated understanding of the aspects of Similarities and differences between the two approaches, while proposing practical frameworks commensurate with the purposes of Sharia. Results: The research found a similarity between the methodology of inference in the principles of Islamic jurisprudence and artificial intelligence algorithms, especially in the use of measurement and induction. But it also showed fundamental differences, as the principles of jurisprudence rely on legal texts and human ijtihad, while adopting models Artificial intelligence on programming and text inputs, which limits its ability to understand legitimate intents. The research also showed the possibility of integration between artificial intelligence models and jurisprudence, with the need for human monitoring to ensure that Sharia purposes are observed. Conclusion: The research provides an important scientific addition in the field of modern Islamic studies, as it combines the Islamic jurisprudential heritage with modern reasoning methodologies represented in artificial intelligence. AI can support jurisprudence by analyzing data and making recommendations, but it cannot replace ijtihad Human for detracting from the understanding of legitimate purposes and moral values. The employment of artificial intelligence in the fields of Sharia must be balanced, so as to enhance facilitation and remove embarrassment without prejudice to the principles and constants of Sharia.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n03.pe05923
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Study of Fundamentalist Methodology

A Saleh, Mohammed W. Al-Neama, Zafar Said
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
Education and Islamic Studies
article

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Study of Fundamentalist Methodology

A Saleh, Mohammed W. Al-Neama, Zafar Said
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The research aims to analyze the methodology of inference in artificial intelligence models and compare it with the curriculum of Islamic fundamentalist schools, and to study the possibility of integration between computer reasoning and jurisprudence. It also seeks to assess the ability of artificial intelligence algorithms to accommodate fundamental rules and legitimate purposes, Propose a methodological framework for employing artificial intelligence techniques in supporting jurisprudence, while maintaining Sharia and ethical standards. Methodology: The research relied on an inductive analytical methodology, as reasoning methodologies in Islamic fundamentalist schools and reasoning mechanisms in artificial intelligence were analyzed separately. The general rules and models extracted from legal texts and modern applications were extrapolated with the aim of providing an integrated understanding of the aspects of Similarities and differences between the two approaches, while proposing practical frameworks commensurate with the purposes of Sharia. Results: The research found a similarity between the methodology of inference in the principles of Islamic jurisprudence and artificial intelligence algorithms, especially in the use of measurement and induction. But it also showed fundamental differences, as the principles of jurisprudence rely on legal texts and human ijtihad, while adopting models Artificial intelligence on programming and text inputs, which limits its ability to understand legitimate intents. The research also showed the possibility of integration between artificial intelligence models and jurisprudence, with the need for human monitoring to ensure that Sharia purposes are observed. Conclusion: The research provides an important scientific addition in the field of modern Islamic studies, as it combines the Islamic jurisprudential heritage with modern reasoning methodologies represented in artificial intelligence. AI can support jurisprudence by analyzing data and making recommendations, but it cannot replace ijtihad Human for detracting from the understanding of legitimate purposes and moral values. The employment of artificial intelligence in the fields of Sharia must be balanced, so as to enhance facilitation and remove embarrassment without prejudice to the principles and constants of Sharia.

Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs ReviewVol. 5(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Education and Islamic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.