Abnormal Institutional Ownership and Expected Returns

I analyze 2,287,907 firm-month observations over 1984–2022 and show that public regulatory 13F filings of institutional ownership contain exploitable information about expected returns even after they have been disclosed to outsiders with a 45-day delay. Using a characteristic-based model, I decompose institutional ownership into abnormal and expected components and find that portfolios of firms with the highest abnormal institutional ownership outperform portfolios of firms with the lowest abnormal institutional ownership by 76 basis points over the following month. I also find that abnormal institutional ownership predicts improvements in firms’ fundamental performance and can be combined with a strategy based on abnormal analyst coverage to produce excess returns. The findings suggest that efficient analysis of public regulatory disclosure can contain potential exploitable information about a firm’s future fundamental performance and expected returns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x251319189
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abnormal Institutional Ownership and Expected Returns

Marcus Kirk
Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Abnormal Institutional Ownership and Expected Returns

Marcus Kirk
article en

Abstract

I analyze 2,287,907 firm-month observations over 1984–2022 and show that public regulatory 13F filings of institutional ownership contain exploitable information about expected returns even after they have been disclosed to outsiders with a 45-day delay. Using a characteristic-based model, I decompose institutional ownership into abnormal and expected components and find that portfolios of firms with the highest abnormal institutional ownership outperform portfolios of firms with the lowest abnormal institutional ownership by 76 basis points over the following month. I also find that abnormal institutional ownership predicts improvements in firms’ fundamental performance and can be combined with a strategy based on abnormal analyst coverage to produce excess returns. The findings suggest that efficient analysis of public regulatory disclosure can contain potential exploitable information about a firm’s future fundamental performance and expected returns.

Journal of Accounting Auditing & FinanceVol. 41(2)
University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Abnormal Institutional Ownership and Expected Returns — Marcus Kirk · Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS