Acceptability and impact of a lifestyle intervention for systemic lupus erythematosus: Qualitative analysis of living well with lupus study

Despite the beneficial effects of a healthier lifestyle, lack of more robust data hampers standardization of recommendations for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Thus, this study explores the experiences, perceptions, and health effects of a newly developed healthy lifestyle intervention in patients with SLE. This was a qualitative, descriptive study using focus group discussions with SLE patients with high cardiovascular risk who participated in a 6-month behavioral lifestyle intervention versus standard of care randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received the Living Well with Lupus (LWWL) program aimed at changing lifestyle behaviors. Focus groups were composed of 4-6 LWWL participants each. Deductive and inductive qualitative content analysis was performed using the MAXQDA data management software. A thematic analysis was conducted wherein thick descriptions of key themes around SLE patients' perceptions related to the intervention and interventions' effects on routine, health-related outcomes and well-being were developed. 19 patients participated in the focus groups (age: 42 ± 7 years; BMI: 28.3 ± 2.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; mild disease activity and organ damage index). Overall, (a) participants were mostly positive about the intervention components, although views of home-based exercise and food diaries were both positive and negatives; (b) barriers and facilitators to intervention adherence included socioeconomic, environmental and individual factors; (c) new behaviors and knowledge were achieved, which participants intended to maintain after the study; and (d) the intervention positively impacted daily functioning, physical and mental health, and overall wellbeing. LWWL participants reported success in achieving healthy lifestyle behaviors in addition to improvements in perceived physical and mental health and overall wellbeing during the LWWL program. Results of this qualitative assessment, including an overview of barriers and facilitators to program initiation and adherence, should guide future research on the implementation of lifestyle interventions in SLE care.Clinicaltrials.govNCT04431167.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lupus
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033251326986
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability and impact of a lifestyle intervention for systemic lupus erythematosus: Qualitative analysis of living well with lupus study

Mary Beth Weber, Fabiana Braga Benatti, Fernanda Rodrigues Lima, Hamilton Roschel et al.
1 citations
Lupus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
1.67
article

Acceptability and impact of a lifestyle intervention for systemic lupus erythematosus: Qualitative analysis of living well with lupus study

Mary Beth Weber, Fabiana Braga Benatti, Fernanda Rodrigues Lima, Hamilton Roschel, Heloísa C. Santo André, Sofia Mendes Sieczkowska, Ana Lúcia de Sá Pinto, Bruna Caruso Mazzolani, Bruno Gualano, Sandra Gofinet Pasoto, Fabiana Infante Smaira, Marina Romero
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite the beneficial effects of a healthier lifestyle, lack of more robust data hampers standardization of recommendations for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Thus, this study explores the experiences, perceptions, and health effects of a newly developed healthy lifestyle intervention in patients with SLE. This was a qualitative, descriptive study using focus group discussions with SLE patients with high cardiovascular risk who participated in a 6-month behavioral lifestyle intervention versus standard of care randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received the Living Well with Lupus (LWWL) program aimed at changing lifestyle behaviors. Focus groups were composed of 4-6 LWWL participants each. Deductive and inductive qualitative content analysis was performed using the MAXQDA data management software. A thematic analysis was conducted wherein thick descriptions of key themes around SLE patients' perceptions related to the intervention and interventions' effects on routine, health-related outcomes and well-being were developed. 19 patients participated in the focus groups (age: 42 ± 7 years; BMI: 28.3 ± 2.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; mild disease activity and organ damage index). Overall, (a) participants were mostly positive about the intervention components, although views of home-based exercise and food diaries were both positive and negatives; (b) barriers and facilitators to intervention adherence included socioeconomic, environmental and individual factors; (c) new behaviors and knowledge were achieved, which participants intended to maintain after the study; and (d) the intervention positively impacted daily functioning, physical and mental health, and overall wellbeing. LWWL participants reported success in achieving healthy lifestyle behaviors in addition to improvements in perceived physical and mental health and overall wellbeing during the LWWL program. Results of this qualitative assessment, including an overview of barriers and facilitators to program initiation and adherence, should guide future research on the implementation of lifestyle interventions in SLE care.Clinicaltrials.govNCT04431167.

LupusVol. 34(5)
Emory University (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundo de Apoio ao Ensino, à Pesquisa e Extensão, Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.