Foundational Reading Knowledge of Rural Special Educators of Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Rural elementary special education teachers primarily working with students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) may have less access to training in foundational reading content. We report results of a foundational reading knowledge assessment administered to a national sample of 220 U.S. special education teachers working in various locales. On average, teachers answered 67% of items correctly. We conducted subgroup analyses using two approaches for parsing school locales (i.e., postsprawl dichotomous and proximity). Using the postsprawl dichotomous approach, we found that rural teachers ( M = 13.13; SD = 2.47) had significantly greater knowledge than non-rural teachers ( M = 11.84; SD = 3.17; p = .005). Descriptive item analyses revealed that rural teachers scored higher on several items assessing knowledge of terminology and lower on application items. The omnibus test was significant for the proximity group analysis as well ( p = .048), but no pairwise comparisons were significant. We discuss implications for research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rural Special Education Quarterly
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705251321486
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foundational Reading Knowledge of Rural Special Educators of Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Kimberly McFadden, Mustafa Ali, Esther R. Lindström, Temiloluwa K. Oni
Rural Special Education Quarterly
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Foundational Reading Knowledge of Rural Special Educators of Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Kimberly McFadden, Mustafa Ali, Esther R. Lindström, Temiloluwa K. Oni
article en

Abstract

Rural elementary special education teachers primarily working with students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) may have less access to training in foundational reading content. We report results of a foundational reading knowledge assessment administered to a national sample of 220 U.S. special education teachers working in various locales. On average, teachers answered 67% of items correctly. We conducted subgroup analyses using two approaches for parsing school locales (i.e., postsprawl dichotomous and proximity). Using the postsprawl dichotomous approach, we found that rural teachers ( M = 13.13; SD = 2.47) had significantly greater knowledge than non-rural teachers ( M = 11.84; SD = 3.17; p = .005). Descriptive item analyses revealed that rural teachers scored higher on several items assessing knowledge of terminology and lower on application items. The omnibus test was significant for the proximity group analysis as well ( p = .048), but no pairwise comparisons were significant. We discuss implications for research and practice.

Rural Special Education QuarterlyVol. 44(2)
Lehigh University (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Lehigh University, National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.