Definitional Issues of Rural Settings in Special Education Research

There is currently no universally adopted definition of rural either by government entities or by rural special education researchers. Yet, the replicability, generalizability, transferability, and validity of rural special education research is dependent upon the definition of rural researchers’ use to situate their work. Examining the terminology used to describe rural settings can help identify for whom and in which contexts study results may be relevant when making policy and practice decisions. The purpose of this descriptive study was to examine current definitions of rural used in rural special education research. Thirty-five empirical articles published from 2020 through 2024 were examined for their rural definitions and the locale characteristics used to describe rural settings. Results indicated that a majority of authors of included studies did not use any formal definition of rural to classify their study setting. Recommendations are provided on ways to define rural and describe study setting characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rural Special Education Quarterly
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705251323255
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Definitional Issues of Rural Settings in Special Education Research

Todd H. Sundeen, Chevonne Sutter, MaryAnn Demchak
6 citations
Rural Special Education Quarterly
Family and Disability Support Research
13.84
article

Definitional Issues of Rural Settings in Special Education Research

Todd H. Sundeen, Chevonne Sutter, MaryAnn Demchak
article en
6 citations

Abstract

There is currently no universally adopted definition of rural either by government entities or by rural special education researchers. Yet, the replicability, generalizability, transferability, and validity of rural special education research is dependent upon the definition of rural researchers’ use to situate their work. Examining the terminology used to describe rural settings can help identify for whom and in which contexts study results may be relevant when making policy and practice decisions. The purpose of this descriptive study was to examine current definitions of rural used in rural special education research. Thirty-five empirical articles published from 2020 through 2024 were examined for their rural definitions and the locale characteristics used to describe rural settings. Results indicated that a majority of authors of included studies did not use any formal definition of rural to classify their study setting. Recommendations are provided on ways to define rural and describe study setting characteristics.

Rural Special Education QuarterlyVol. 44(3)
University of Nevada, Reno (US), University of Northern Colorado (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Family and Disability Support Research
13.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Definitional Issues of Rural Settings in Special Education Research — Todd H. Sundeen, Chevonne Sutter, et al. · Rural Special Education Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS