Comparison of 75g OGTT and Four Sugar Profiles in Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Objective: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing issue in Pakistan because of its associations with the adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Four Sugar Profile Test compared with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) which is the current gold standard in detecting GDM. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted by enrolling 260 pregnant women who were between 24-28 weeks gestation at Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad from 1st July 2024 to 31st December 2024. Both the Four Sugar Profile Test (which measures fasting and postprandial glucose levels after meals) and the OGTT were administered to all participants. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to compare the diagnostic performance of the two tests. Results: The prevalence of GDM was 87.6% using the Four Sugar Profile Test and 91.5% with the OGTT which was taken as gold standard. The Four Sugar Profile Test had a sensitivity of 91.18%, specificity of 50%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.18%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 34.38%. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 87.69%. Conclusion: The Four Sugar Profile Test demonstrated a good sensitivity to the OGTT; suggesting it may serve as an alternative diagnostic tool for GDM, especially in settings where the OGTT cannot be done. However, we need further studies to validate the findings and assess long-term maternal and neonatal outcomes for the Pakistan population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i3.811
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of 75g OGTT and Four Sugar Profiles in Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Darakhshan Sheikh, Yamina Ishtiaq, Shazia Fakhar, Hina Gul
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Comparison of 75g OGTT and Four Sugar Profiles in Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Darakhshan Sheikh, Yamina Ishtiaq, Shazia Fakhar, Hina Gul
article en

Abstract

Objective: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing issue in Pakistan because of its associations with the adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Four Sugar Profile Test compared with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) which is the current gold standard in detecting GDM. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted by enrolling 260 pregnant women who were between 24-28 weeks gestation at Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad from 1st July 2024 to 31st December 2024. Both the Four Sugar Profile Test (which measures fasting and postprandial glucose levels after meals) and the OGTT were administered to all participants. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to compare the diagnostic performance of the two tests. Results: The prevalence of GDM was 87.6% using the Four Sugar Profile Test and 91.5% with the OGTT which was taken as gold standard. The Four Sugar Profile Test had a sensitivity of 91.18%, specificity of 50%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.18%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 34.38%. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 87.69%. Conclusion: The Four Sugar Profile Test demonstrated a good sensitivity to the OGTT; suggesting it may serve as an alternative diagnostic tool for GDM, especially in settings where the OGTT cannot be done. However, we need further studies to validate the findings and assess long-term maternal and neonatal outcomes for the Pakistan population.

Indus journal of bioscience research.Vol. 3(3)
Shifa International Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.