Gene Expression Model for the Disease Prediction with Auto-Encoder Model with Classifiers

Gene expression is the process through which genetic information in DNA is converted into functional products, primarily proteins. This involves two main steps: transcription, where DNA is copied into messenger RNA (mRNA), and translation, where mRNA is decoded by ribosomes to synthesize proteins. Gene expression is tightly regulated to ensure proper cellular function, and its analysis is vital in fields like cancer research, drug development, and genetic engineering. Hence, this paper proposed effective Voting-based Stacked Denoising Auto-encoder (VSDA) for the prediction of diseases. The VADA model uses the stacked model within the Auto-encoder for the accurate prediction of the gene expressions. This paper investigates the performance of four machine learning classifiers—Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)—on a cancer diagnosis dataset, using metrics such as Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and Support across multiple cancer types. Our results show that MLP achieves the highest overall performance with an average Precision of 0.92, Recall of 0.75, and F1-Score of 0.74. SVM follows closely with an average Precision of 0.89, Recall of 0.78, and F1-Score of 0.79, demonstrating strong reliability, particularly for cancers such as LUAD, KIRC, and THCA. RF exhibited an average Precision of 0.75, Recall of 0.68, and F1-Score of 0.66, indicating balanced performance but with slightly lower accuracy compared to SVM and MLP. KNN, while performing well in certain cancer types, had the lowest overall F1-Score of 0.60 and Precision of 0.71, showing greater variability across different cancer types. These results underscore the superiority of MLP in most scenarios, with SVM offering a competitive alternative for specific cancers. The study highlights the importance of classifier selection based on specific cancer datasets, with the goal of improving diagnostic accuracy and supporting clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biosciences and Medicines
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2025.133013
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gene Expression Model for the Disease Prediction with Auto-Encoder Model with Classifiers

A. C. Kunwar, Shulin Wang
Journal of Biosciences and Medicines
Gene expression and cancer classification
article

Gene Expression Model for the Disease Prediction with Auto-Encoder Model with Classifiers

A. C. Kunwar, Shulin Wang
article en

Abstract

Gene expression is the process through which genetic information in DNA is converted into functional products, primarily proteins. This involves two main steps: transcription, where DNA is copied into messenger RNA (mRNA), and translation, where mRNA is decoded by ribosomes to synthesize proteins. Gene expression is tightly regulated to ensure proper cellular function, and its analysis is vital in fields like cancer research, drug development, and genetic engineering. Hence, this paper proposed effective Voting-based Stacked Denoising Auto-encoder (VSDA) for the prediction of diseases. The VADA model uses the stacked model within the Auto-encoder for the accurate prediction of the gene expressions. This paper investigates the performance of four machine learning classifiers—Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)—on a cancer diagnosis dataset, using metrics such as Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and Support across multiple cancer types. Our results show that MLP achieves the highest overall performance with an average Precision of 0.92, Recall of 0.75, and F1-Score of 0.74. SVM follows closely with an average Precision of 0.89, Recall of 0.78, and F1-Score of 0.79, demonstrating strong reliability, particularly for cancers such as LUAD, KIRC, and THCA. RF exhibited an average Precision of 0.75, Recall of 0.68, and F1-Score of 0.66, indicating balanced performance but with slightly lower accuracy compared to SVM and MLP. KNN, while performing well in certain cancer types, had the lowest overall F1-Score of 0.60 and Precision of 0.71, showing greater variability across different cancer types. These results underscore the superiority of MLP in most scenarios, with SVM offering a competitive alternative for specific cancers. The study highlights the importance of classifier selection based on specific cancer datasets, with the goal of improving diagnostic accuracy and supporting clinical decision-making.

Journal of Biosciences and MedicinesVol. 13(03)
Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Gene expression and cancer classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.