Getting it Wrong: Biological Mistake-Making as a Cross-System, Cross-Scale Phenomenon

The making of mistakes by organisms and living systems generally is an underexplored way of conceptualising biology and organising experimental research. We set out an informal account of biological mistakes and why they should be taken seriously in biological investigation. We then give an indirect defence of their importance by applying the concept of mistake making to three kinds of activity: timing, calculation, and communication. We give a range of examples to show that mistakes in these kinds of behaviour can be found across a diversity of scales and systems. We also suggest ideas for empirical research that naturally arise from these cases. The reality and potential for mistake making across such a wide range of biological entities shows that it is not a purely human phenomenon. Getting it wrong seems to be central to biology as a whole, and to be a potentially productive organising principle for generating novel research questions and experimental hypotheses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2025.2472482
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Getting it Wrong: Biological Mistake-Making as a Cross-System, Cross-Scale Phenomenon

Christopher J. Austin, Jonathan Hill, Jonathan M. Gibbins, David S. Oderberg et al.
1 citations
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Getting it Wrong: Biological Mistake-Making as a Cross-System, Cross-Scale Phenomenon

Christopher J. Austin, Jonathan Hill, Jonathan M. Gibbins, David S. Oderberg, Ingo Bojak, François Cinotti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The making of mistakes by organisms and living systems generally is an underexplored way of conceptualising biology and organising experimental research. We set out an informal account of biological mistakes and why they should be taken seriously in biological investigation. We then give an indirect defence of their importance by applying the concept of mistake making to three kinds of activity: timing, calculation, and communication. We give a range of examples to show that mistakes in these kinds of behaviour can be found across a diversity of scales and systems. We also suggest ideas for empirical research that naturally arise from these cases. The reality and potential for mistake making across such a wide range of biological entities shows that it is not a purely human phenomenon. Getting it wrong seems to be central to biology as a whole, and to be a potentially productive organising principle for generating novel research questions and experimental hypotheses.

International Studies in the Philosophy of ScienceVol. 38(2)
University of Reading (GB)
John Templeton Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.