Pull-out behavior of metallic strips with structured surface elements for use in reinforced soil bridge abutments

• The pull-out behavior of conventional smooth and structured rough metallic strips was experimentally evaluated. • Apparatus was developed to investigate the role of surface design of metallic strips in reinforced soil bridge abutments. • Pull-out tests conducted on conventional smooth and three structured rough surfaces in sand specimens. • Metallic strips with structured elements mobilized larger pull-out (shear) resistance against conventional smooth strips. • The Pull-out capacity of metallic strips could be enhanced using structured elements. In this paper, metallic strips with structured surface elements of different shapes were introduced. Experimental tests performed on metallic strips sheared against poorly-graded sand have shown the key role of surface texture on the pullout (shear) resistance at the interface between sand and strip surface. Four metallic strips: strip I – smooth (no elements), strip II – rough (triangle-like elements), strip III – rough (ribbed elements), and strip IV – rough (circle-like elements) were examined in a pullout test apparatus under different levels of confinement stress. The results of the pullout tests indicate that surfaces with structured elements mobilized a significantly high pullout resistance when compared to conventional smooth (untextured) baseline strip. It was observed that pullout resistance increased with confining stress (i.e., confinement level), strip IV mobilized the largest resistance followed by strip II then strip III at the same test conditions. The increase in mobilized resistance is attributed to the development of passive soil wedges at the face of structured elements under confinement, which leads to additional passive resistance. The pullout resistance of strip IV exhibited an increase up to 208 % of the baseline resistance of untextured strip. These findings could be beneficial for enhancing the pullout capacity of metallic strips in reinforced soil bridge abutments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104639
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pull-out behavior of metallic strips with structured surface elements for use in reinforced soil bridge abutments

Abdel Kareem Alzo’ubi, Ammar A. Alshannaq, Mohammad F. Tamimi, Mu’ath I. Abu Qamar
4 citations
Results in Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
3.81
article

Pull-out behavior of metallic strips with structured surface elements for use in reinforced soil bridge abutments

Abdel Kareem Alzo’ubi, Ammar A. Alshannaq, Mohammad F. Tamimi, Mu’ath I. Abu Qamar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• The pull-out behavior of conventional smooth and structured rough metallic strips was experimentally evaluated. • Apparatus was developed to investigate the role of surface design of metallic strips in reinforced soil bridge abutments. • Pull-out tests conducted on conventional smooth and three structured rough surfaces in sand specimens. • Metallic strips with structured elements mobilized larger pull-out (shear) resistance against conventional smooth strips. • The Pull-out capacity of metallic strips could be enhanced using structured elements. In this paper, metallic strips with structured surface elements of different shapes were introduced. Experimental tests performed on metallic strips sheared against poorly-graded sand have shown the key role of surface texture on the pullout (shear) resistance at the interface between sand and strip surface. Four metallic strips: strip I – smooth (no elements), strip II – rough (triangle-like elements), strip III – rough (ribbed elements), and strip IV – rough (circle-like elements) were examined in a pullout test apparatus under different levels of confinement stress. The results of the pullout tests indicate that surfaces with structured elements mobilized a significantly high pullout resistance when compared to conventional smooth (untextured) baseline strip. It was observed that pullout resistance increased with confining stress (i.e., confinement level), strip IV mobilized the largest resistance followed by strip II then strip III at the same test conditions. The increase in mobilized resistance is attributed to the development of passive soil wedges at the face of structured elements under confinement, which leads to additional passive resistance. The pullout resistance of strip IV exhibited an increase up to 208 % of the baseline resistance of untextured strip. These findings could be beneficial for enhancing the pullout capacity of metallic strips in reinforced soil bridge abutments.

Results in EngineeringVol. 26
Consolidated Contractors Company (Greece) (GR), Yarmouk University (JO)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.