Politik Uang dalam Pilkada 2024 Kabupaten Jayapura: Antara Legitimasi Sosial dan Perilaku Memilih

This study examines the prevalence of money politics in the 2024 Regional Head Election (Pilkada) in Jayapura Regency, considering its impact on social legitimacy and the electoral behavior of local communities. The research aims to analyze public acceptance and preferences regarding different forms of money politics and the extent to which it influences voting decisions. Three key factors are observed: acceptance, its influence on voting behavior, and the most preferred form of monetary incentives. This study employs a quantitative methodology using a survey. Data collection was conducted through stratified multistage random sampling, involving 440 respondents. The findings reveal several important insights. First, the acceptance of money politics is notably high. Second, financial assistance is the most preferred form of incentive. Lastly, monetary incentives do not operate independently in shaping electoral choices; rather, they function within a broader patron-client framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politica Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32505/politica.v11i2.10894
Primary Topic
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Politik Uang dalam Pilkada 2024 Kabupaten Jayapura: Antara Legitimasi Sosial dan Perilaku Memilih

Jurisman Kadji, Hendra Yasin
Politica Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
article

Politik Uang dalam Pilkada 2024 Kabupaten Jayapura: Antara Legitimasi Sosial dan Perilaku Memilih

Jurisman Kadji, Hendra Yasin
article en

Abstract

This study examines the prevalence of money politics in the 2024 Regional Head Election (Pilkada) in Jayapura Regency, considering its impact on social legitimacy and the electoral behavior of local communities. The research aims to analyze public acceptance and preferences regarding different forms of money politics and the extent to which it influences voting decisions. Three key factors are observed: acceptance, its influence on voting behavior, and the most preferred form of monetary incentives. This study employs a quantitative methodology using a survey. Data collection was conducted through stratified multistage random sampling, involving 440 respondents. The findings reveal several important insights. First, the acceptance of money politics is notably high. Second, financial assistance is the most preferred form of incentive. Lastly, monetary incentives do not operate independently in shaping electoral choices; rather, they function within a broader patron-client framework.

Politica Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik IslamVol. 11(2)
Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.