Satellite remote sensing can operationalise the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology in the biome-diverse north-east of Brazil

Accurate biome delineation is difficult where biomes occupy the same climatic space, as is the case for tropical dry forest and savanna. The resulting confusion limits our ability to understand and manage impacts of global change on these biomes. To address this, we developed an unsupervised, repeatable method to delineate biomes and their component functional ecosystems, based on landscape-level vegetation structure measured using remote sensing and an understanding of the ecology of the region. This approach contrasts with previous definitions, based on climate differences amongst savanna, dry forest and rain forest. Using the heterogeneous north-east Brazil, where several biomes interdigitate, as a case study, a hierarchical functional ecosystem classification is proposed that aligns with both the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology (GET) and previous work. Based on fuzzy clustering of remotely sensed vegetation attributes, seven groups were found, identified as rain forest, cerrado (savanna) and five caatinga vegetation groups. These groups broadly align with the literature, for example, sedimentary and arboreal caatinga. These groups align with three ‘Ecosystem Functional Groups’ (EFGs) described by the IUCN GET and, additionally, suggest there is a new, fourth EFG in the region: non-pyric shrublands. Random Forest models showed soil pH was the most important environmental variable distinguishing these vegetation groups. These results suggest a remotely sensed structure-based approach is an effective method for operationalising the IUCN GET. North-East Brazil – where many EFGs are interdigitated – serves as a challenging case study and, therefore, we hope our approach will have generality for other regions globally. There are seven vegetation groups in northeast Brazil, including savanna, rain forest and five types of caatinga. Most of these vegetation groups align with the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0, but non-pyric shrubland (caatinga) vegetation may represent a new Ecosystem Functional Group. Soil pH is the strongest determinant of vegetation distribution in northeast Brazil. Remote sensing can provide objective, spatially explicit information on vegetation types in the region, largely consistent with previous vegetation classifications. Accurate biome mapping is vital for management, as biomes differ in ecosystem function and consequently require different management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers of Biogeography
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21425/fob.18.145498
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Satellite remote sensing can operationalise the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology in the biome-diverse north-east of Brazil

R. Toby Pennington, Oliver Lawrence Phillips, Desirée M. Ramos, Kyle Graham Dexter et al.
2 citations
Frontiers of Biogeography
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
2.21
article

Satellite remote sensing can operationalise the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology in the biome-diverse north-east of Brazil

R. Toby Pennington, Oliver Lawrence Phillips, Desirée M. Ramos, Kyle Graham Dexter, Ítalo Antônio Cotta Coutinho, Casey M. Ryan, Timothy R. Baker, Lucy H. Wells
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Accurate biome delineation is difficult where biomes occupy the same climatic space, as is the case for tropical dry forest and savanna. The resulting confusion limits our ability to understand and manage impacts of global change on these biomes. To address this, we developed an unsupervised, repeatable method to delineate biomes and their component functional ecosystems, based on landscape-level vegetation structure measured using remote sensing and an understanding of the ecology of the region. This approach contrasts with previous definitions, based on climate differences amongst savanna, dry forest and rain forest. Using the heterogeneous north-east Brazil, where several biomes interdigitate, as a case study, a hierarchical functional ecosystem classification is proposed that aligns with both the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology (GET) and previous work. Based on fuzzy clustering of remotely sensed vegetation attributes, seven groups were found, identified as rain forest, cerrado (savanna) and five caatinga vegetation groups. These groups broadly align with the literature, for example, sedimentary and arboreal caatinga. These groups align with three ‘Ecosystem Functional Groups’ (EFGs) described by the IUCN GET and, additionally, suggest there is a new, fourth EFG in the region: non-pyric shrublands. Random Forest models showed soil pH was the most important environmental variable distinguishing these vegetation groups. These results suggest a remotely sensed structure-based approach is an effective method for operationalising the IUCN GET. North-East Brazil – where many EFGs are interdigitated – serves as a challenging case study and, therefore, we hope our approach will have generality for other regions globally. There are seven vegetation groups in northeast Brazil, including savanna, rain forest and five types of caatinga. Most of these vegetation groups align with the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0, but non-pyric shrubland (caatinga) vegetation may represent a new Ecosystem Functional Group. Soil pH is the strongest determinant of vegetation distribution in northeast Brazil. Remote sensing can provide objective, spatially explicit information on vegetation types in the region, largely consistent with previous vegetation classifications. Accurate biome mapping is vital for management, as biomes differ in ecosystem function and consequently require different management.

Frontiers of BiogeographyVol. 18
University of Leeds (GB), Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR), University of Turin (IT), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.