The Timing of Sugar Beet Harvesting Significantly Influences Roots Yield and Quality Characteristics

The accumulation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) root yield across Central and Eastern Europe typically occurs mostly from July to September but can vary substantially depending on precipitation patterns. When summer rainfall is insufficient, the period of intensive yield accumulation may be delayed, often affecting the technological quality of the roots. Conversely, as light and thermal conditions deteriorate in autumn, growth processes slow down, and each cultivar’s response to late-season conditions may vary. To investigate these dynamics, we examined nine sugar beet cultivars (Zeltic, Pacific, Mariza, Everest, BTS 2205N, Jaromir, Jantar, Eliska KWS, and Klara) under three harvest dates (8–10 September—first date; 7–8 October—second date; and 3–5 November—third date) during the 2020–2021 growing seasons. Both cultivar and harvest timing had a significant impact on root yield, sucrose content, and the concentrations of molasses-forming elements (K, Na, and α-amino N), though the magnitude of these effects strongly depended on weather conditions. In 2020, which was characterized by very high precipitation in June and August, harvesting in early September resulted in optimal yield for most cultivars, with no significant benefit from delaying harvest. However, in 2021, when precipitation was moderate and more evenly distributed, later harvest dates enhanced both yield and sucrose content in several cultivars (e.g., Eliska KWS and Jantar). Among all cultivars tested, Eliska KWS consistently demonstrated high root yield and sucrose content. The sucrose content in the roots was strongly influenced by weather conditions in each study year. In 2021, which had average water availability, sucrose content was high, and delaying the harvest led to an increase in sucrose content while reducing molasses-forming elements in the roots. In contrast, in 2020, during summer rainfall, the effect of harvest date on quality traits was significantly weaker and largely dependent on the cultivar. These findings underscore that choosing the optimal harvest date is highly site- and season-dependent, shaped by precipitation distribution, late-season temperatures, and cultivar genotype. In practical terms, these results can help producers and sugar processors align harvest schedules with local conditions to optimize both root yield and technological quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030704
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Timing of Sugar Beet Harvesting Significantly Influences Roots Yield and Quality Characteristics

Radosław Nowicki, Edward Wilczewski, Michał Kłosowski
1 citations
Agronomy
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
1.90
article

The Timing of Sugar Beet Harvesting Significantly Influences Roots Yield and Quality Characteristics

Radosław Nowicki, Edward Wilczewski, Michał Kłosowski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The accumulation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) root yield across Central and Eastern Europe typically occurs mostly from July to September but can vary substantially depending on precipitation patterns. When summer rainfall is insufficient, the period of intensive yield accumulation may be delayed, often affecting the technological quality of the roots. Conversely, as light and thermal conditions deteriorate in autumn, growth processes slow down, and each cultivar’s response to late-season conditions may vary. To investigate these dynamics, we examined nine sugar beet cultivars (Zeltic, Pacific, Mariza, Everest, BTS 2205N, Jaromir, Jantar, Eliska KWS, and Klara) under three harvest dates (8–10 September—first date; 7–8 October—second date; and 3–5 November—third date) during the 2020–2021 growing seasons. Both cultivar and harvest timing had a significant impact on root yield, sucrose content, and the concentrations of molasses-forming elements (K, Na, and α-amino N), though the magnitude of these effects strongly depended on weather conditions. In 2020, which was characterized by very high precipitation in June and August, harvesting in early September resulted in optimal yield for most cultivars, with no significant benefit from delaying harvest. However, in 2021, when precipitation was moderate and more evenly distributed, later harvest dates enhanced both yield and sucrose content in several cultivars (e.g., Eliska KWS and Jantar). Among all cultivars tested, Eliska KWS consistently demonstrated high root yield and sucrose content. The sucrose content in the roots was strongly influenced by weather conditions in each study year. In 2021, which had average water availability, sucrose content was high, and delaying the harvest led to an increase in sucrose content while reducing molasses-forming elements in the roots. In contrast, in 2020, during summer rainfall, the effect of harvest date on quality traits was significantly weaker and largely dependent on the cultivar. These findings underscore that choosing the optimal harvest date is highly site- and season-dependent, shaped by precipitation distribution, late-season temperatures, and cultivar genotype. In practical terms, these results can help producers and sugar processors align harvest schedules with local conditions to optimize both root yield and technological quality.

AgronomyVol. 15(3)
Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL), University of Rzeszów (PL)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.