Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and performance of postgraduate nursing students regarding clinical reasoning and evidence-based nursing: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Iran

The findings of this empirical investigation revealed that postgraduate students across both master's and doctoral programs demonstrated exceptionally favorable mean scores in all three components of clinical reasoning and evidence-based nursing: knowledge, attitude, and practice. Of particular significance was the observation that doctoral students consistently achieved substantially higher mean scores across these components compared to their counterparts in master's programs. The findings from this investigation offer valuable implications for nursing education administrators in their ongoing efforts to enhance educational outcomes. These results provide a robust framework through which administrators can systematically evaluate nursing students' knowledge, attitudes, and performance in both clinical reasoning and evidence-based nursing practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nursing
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02919-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and performance of postgraduate nursing students regarding clinical reasoning and evidence-based nursing: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Iran

Zahra Mohebi, Sorur Javanmardifard, Ali Taghinezhad, Azizallah Dehghan et al.
2 citations
BMC Nursing
Health Sciences Research and Education
5.63
article

Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and performance of postgraduate nursing students regarding clinical reasoning and evidence-based nursing: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Iran

Zahra Mohebi, Sorur Javanmardifard, Ali Taghinezhad, Azizallah Dehghan, Mostafa Bijani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The findings of this empirical investigation revealed that postgraduate students across both master's and doctoral programs demonstrated exceptionally favorable mean scores in all three components of clinical reasoning and evidence-based nursing: knowledge, attitude, and practice. Of particular significance was the observation that doctoral students consistently achieved substantially higher mean scores across these components compared to their counterparts in master's programs. The findings from this investigation offer valuable implications for nursing education administrators in their ongoing efforts to enhance educational outcomes. These results provide a robust framework through which administrators can systematically evaluate nursing students' knowledge, attitudes, and performance in both clinical reasoning and evidence-based nursing practice.

BMC NursingVol. 24(1)
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Fasa University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Sciences Research and Education
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and performance of postgraduate nursing students regarding clinical reasoning and evidence-based nursing: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Iran — Zahra Mohebi, Sorur Javanmardifard, et al. · BMC Nursing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS