Manufacturer Choice of Selling Format in a Closed‐Loop Supply Chain

ABSTRACT This study builds stylized models to discuss the interaction between product recovery and online selling format in a closed‐loop supply chain, which comprises a manufacturer, online platforms, and customers. The manufacturer collects used products from customers, before choosing the product's selling format from the reseller only format, the marketplace only format, and both the reseller and marketplace formats. For each format, the optimal decisions (recovery rate, quantity, and price) are first obtained. Notably, we find that the marketplace format induces the manufacturer to improve the recovery rate. Furthermore, our results indicate that the manufacturer's choice of selling format depends on the saved cost of manufacturing a product using the collected products and the value fraction of customer preference for the marketplace relative to the reseller format. Specifically, if the value fraction is smaller but the saved cost is larger, using both the reseller and marketplace formats is preferred. And, we find that when the manufacturer changes from the reseller only format to both the reseller and marketplace formats, the selling price of the reseller platform decreases. Besides, we make some extensions to show the robustness of our assumptions and provide further guidelines for practitioners in the appendix.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial and Decision Economics
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4475
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manufacturer Choice of Selling Format in a Closed‐Loop Supply Chain

Qin Su, Haike Qiao, Wang Bi
Managerial and Decision Economics
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Manufacturer Choice of Selling Format in a Closed‐Loop Supply Chain

Qin Su, Haike Qiao, Wang Bi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study builds stylized models to discuss the interaction between product recovery and online selling format in a closed‐loop supply chain, which comprises a manufacturer, online platforms, and customers. The manufacturer collects used products from customers, before choosing the product's selling format from the reseller only format, the marketplace only format, and both the reseller and marketplace formats. For each format, the optimal decisions (recovery rate, quantity, and price) are first obtained. Notably, we find that the marketplace format induces the manufacturer to improve the recovery rate. Furthermore, our results indicate that the manufacturer's choice of selling format depends on the saved cost of manufacturing a product using the collected products and the value fraction of customer preference for the marketplace relative to the reseller format. Specifically, if the value fraction is smaller but the saved cost is larger, using both the reseller and marketplace formats is preferred. And, we find that when the manufacturer changes from the reseller only format to both the reseller and marketplace formats, the selling price of the reseller platform decreases. Besides, we make some extensions to show the robustness of our assumptions and provide further guidelines for practitioners in the appendix.

Managerial and Decision EconomicsVol. 46(4)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Chang'an University (CN), Zhuhai Institute of Advanced Technology (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.