The European Union’s response to transnational repression: Are we moving towards securitisation?

Abstract The article explores how European Union (EU) democracies respond to the transnational repression phenomenon. Authoritarian transnational repression has become an increasingly recurrent phenomenon in recent years. However, we still have an inadequate understanding of how Western democracies respond to such forms of authoritarian interference. This article sheds light on the EU’s responses to the authoritarian transnational repression phenomenon by using the analytical framework of securitisation as its theoretical approach. In doing so, it aims to find out the extent to which transnational repression has been securitised in the EU. The study demonstrates that the EU’s response to the transnational repression phenomenon exhibits the case of a failed securitisation. The paper draws its analysis from policy documents, semi-structured interviews with EU stakeholders, and descriptive analysis from the Freedom House Transnational Repression Database.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of International Security
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2025.2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The European Union’s response to transnational repression: Are we moving towards securitisation?

Saipira Furstenberg
1 citations
European Journal of International Security
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
8.52
article

The European Union’s response to transnational repression: Are we moving towards securitisation?

Saipira Furstenberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The article explores how European Union (EU) democracies respond to the transnational repression phenomenon. Authoritarian transnational repression has become an increasingly recurrent phenomenon in recent years. However, we still have an inadequate understanding of how Western democracies respond to such forms of authoritarian interference. This article sheds light on the EU’s responses to the authoritarian transnational repression phenomenon by using the analytical framework of securitisation as its theoretical approach. In doing so, it aims to find out the extent to which transnational repression has been securitised in the EU. The study demonstrates that the EU’s response to the transnational repression phenomenon exhibits the case of a failed securitisation. The paper draws its analysis from policy documents, semi-structured interviews with EU stakeholders, and descriptive analysis from the Freedom House Transnational Repression Database.

European Journal of International SecurityVol. 11(2)
University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The European Union’s response to transnational repression: Are we moving towards securitisation? — Saipira Furstenberg · European Journal of International Security (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS