How air cleaners, ventilation, and outdoor air pollution influence air quality in European hospitals: Case studies from Finland and Romania

• First-time indoor/outdoor black carbon (BC) concentrations reported in hospitals. • Lung-deposited surface area (LDSA) infiltration factors varied between 0.04 and 0.64. • Indoor BC, LDSA, and PM 2.5 concentration varied by factor of 100 between hospitals. • Air cleaners reduced indoor/outdoor ratios of particulate pollution by 70–90 %. • Air purifiers are effective in both mechanically and naturally ventilated spaces. In healthcare facilities, maintaining a controlled, contaminant-free environment is essential. This involves eliminating airborne contaminants and ensuring a continuous supply of clean air. The objectives of this study were to understand the differences in the indoor and outdoor characteristics of particulate matter pollution (fine particle mass (PM 2.5 ), lung-deposited surface area (LDSA), and black carbon mass (BC) concentrations) and environmental conditions (air temperature, relative humidity and carbon dioxide concentration) in hospital buildings in Romania and Finland. Additionally, the effectiveness and impact of ventilation and air cleaning technologies on the indoor air quality were assessed. The highest mean concentrations of outdoor PM 2.5 , LDSA, and BC were observed in Bucharest, with values of 32.7 µg/m³, 59.4 µm²/cm³, and 3.3 µg/m³, respectively. The use of air cleaners effectively reduced indoor particulate concentrations in both naturally and mechanically ventilated buildings. In the naturally ventilated hospital in Bucharest, Romania, the use of air cleaners resulted in reductions of up to 93.8 % and 89.3 % in the median PM 2.5 and LDSA indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratios, respectively. In the mechanically ventilated hospital in Espoo city in Finland, corresponding I/O-ratio reductions were 78.6 % and 69.9 %. These results highlight that indoor air quality is influenced by both indoor and outdoor air characteristics, as well as the building's ventilation and filtration systems. In addition, reduction in indoor concentration values emphasize the effectiveness of using portable air cleaners as a local solution for reducing particulate pollution when integrated with an appropriate natural or mechanical ventilation system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112865
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How air cleaners, ventilation, and outdoor air pollution influence air quality in European hospitals: Case studies from Finland and Romania

Mohamed Elsayed, Topi Rönkkö, Ville Silvonen, Hilkka Timonen et al.
1 citations
Building and Environment
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.20
article

How air cleaners, ventilation, and outdoor air pollution influence air quality in European hospitals: Case studies from Finland and Romania

Mohamed Elsayed, Topi Rönkkö, Ville Silvonen, Hilkka Timonen, Piia Sormunen, Sami Harni, Henna Lintusaari, Anni Luoto, Jani Hakala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• First-time indoor/outdoor black carbon (BC) concentrations reported in hospitals. • Lung-deposited surface area (LDSA) infiltration factors varied between 0.04 and 0.64. • Indoor BC, LDSA, and PM 2.5 concentration varied by factor of 100 between hospitals. • Air cleaners reduced indoor/outdoor ratios of particulate pollution by 70–90 %. • Air purifiers are effective in both mechanically and naturally ventilated spaces. In healthcare facilities, maintaining a controlled, contaminant-free environment is essential. This involves eliminating airborne contaminants and ensuring a continuous supply of clean air. The objectives of this study were to understand the differences in the indoor and outdoor characteristics of particulate matter pollution (fine particle mass (PM 2.5 ), lung-deposited surface area (LDSA), and black carbon mass (BC) concentrations) and environmental conditions (air temperature, relative humidity and carbon dioxide concentration) in hospital buildings in Romania and Finland. Additionally, the effectiveness and impact of ventilation and air cleaning technologies on the indoor air quality were assessed. The highest mean concentrations of outdoor PM 2.5 , LDSA, and BC were observed in Bucharest, with values of 32.7 µg/m³, 59.4 µm²/cm³, and 3.3 µg/m³, respectively. The use of air cleaners effectively reduced indoor particulate concentrations in both naturally and mechanically ventilated buildings. In the naturally ventilated hospital in Bucharest, Romania, the use of air cleaners resulted in reductions of up to 93.8 % and 89.3 % in the median PM 2.5 and LDSA indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratios, respectively. In the mechanically ventilated hospital in Espoo city in Finland, corresponding I/O-ratio reductions were 78.6 % and 69.9 %. These results highlight that indoor air quality is influenced by both indoor and outdoor air characteristics, as well as the building's ventilation and filtration systems. In addition, reduction in indoor concentration values emphasize the effectiveness of using portable air cleaners as a local solution for reducing particulate pollution when integrated with an appropriate natural or mechanical ventilation system.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 276
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), Tampere University (FI), Granlund (Finland) (FI), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
Business Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.