Crowdfunding Amidst FinTech Winter: Complement or Substitute?

This study examines the transformative potential of FinTech, particularly crowdfunding, in the context of traditional financial systems amidst the FinTech market downturn (‘Winter’) of 2022. We address a fundamental question: Does crowdfunding represent a viable alternative to conventional finance, or does it merely function as an extension of existing financial infrastructure? To investigate this relationship empirically, we developed a proprietary crowdfunding index and employed Interconnectedness Index methodology to compare the spillover effects of crowdfunding and traditional financial systems with common economic factors such as interest rates, USD index, economic uncertainty, cryptocurrency (Bitcoin), as well as commodities (gold and oil). Despite crowdfunding’s remarkable growth trajectory over the past decade, our empirical evidence indicates that it has not yet emerged as a viable substitute for conventional financial mechanisms. These findings carry substantial implications for regulatory frameworks, industry stakeholders, and academic discourse, contributing to the broader understanding of FinTech’s disruptive capacity within the financial ecosystem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18030154
Citations
1
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crowdfunding Amidst FinTech Winter: Complement or Substitute?

Ruslan Nagayev, Ahmet Faruk Aysan, Shadi Al Shebli
1 citations
Journal of risk and financial management
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
2.28
article

Crowdfunding Amidst FinTech Winter: Complement or Substitute?

Ruslan Nagayev, Ahmet Faruk Aysan, Shadi Al Shebli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the transformative potential of FinTech, particularly crowdfunding, in the context of traditional financial systems amidst the FinTech market downturn (‘Winter’) of 2022. We address a fundamental question: Does crowdfunding represent a viable alternative to conventional finance, or does it merely function as an extension of existing financial infrastructure? To investigate this relationship empirically, we developed a proprietary crowdfunding index and employed Interconnectedness Index methodology to compare the spillover effects of crowdfunding and traditional financial systems with common economic factors such as interest rates, USD index, economic uncertainty, cryptocurrency (Bitcoin), as well as commodities (gold and oil). Despite crowdfunding’s remarkable growth trajectory over the past decade, our empirical evidence indicates that it has not yet emerged as a viable substitute for conventional financial mechanisms. These findings carry substantial implications for regulatory frameworks, industry stakeholders, and academic discourse, contributing to the broader understanding of FinTech’s disruptive capacity within the financial ecosystem.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 18(3)
Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA), Qatar Foundation (QA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
2.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.