Estimated Energy Requirement: Comparison Between the 2005 and 2023 Dietary Reference Intakes in Sedentary Adults and Older Adults—A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Equations for estimating energy expenditure are developed for specific populations and contexts, including clinical settings, body composition variations, and age groups, to enhance precision in nutritional planning and health promotion. Objective: To compare the estimated daily energy requirements using the equations from the 2005 and 2023 Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy in sedentary adults and elderly individuals. Methods: A cross-sectional, retrospective study analyzed data from records at a university outpatient clinic using convenience sampling. Participants included sedentary individuals aged 20 years or older of both sexes. The comparison was conducted using repeated measures Analysis of Variance (rmANOVA). Results: Data from 431 individuals (80% female, mean age 43.57 ± 17.30 years) were analyzed. The 2023 equations provided higher energy estimates compared to the 2005 equations. The rmANOVA revealed a significant difference between the energy estimates (F(1, 429) = 1567.24, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.02), with the 2023 equations consistently yielding higher values. Conclusions: The results indicate that the estimated energy requirements significantly increased in the 2023 equations compared with those of 2005, highlighting their relevance to clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obesities
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities5010015
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimated Energy Requirement: Comparison Between the 2005 and 2023 Dietary Reference Intakes in Sedentary Adults and Older Adults—A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Daniele Gonçalves Vieira, Jaqueline Fernandes Carneiro, Izadora Oliveira Felez, Dalton Luiz Schiessel et al.
Obesities
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Estimated Energy Requirement: Comparison Between the 2005 and 2023 Dietary Reference Intakes in Sedentary Adults and Older Adults—A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Daniele Gonçalves Vieira, Jaqueline Fernandes Carneiro, Izadora Oliveira Felez, Dalton Luiz Schiessel, Anderson Matheus Oliveira Haas Verdi, Adriana Masiero Kühl, Angélica Rocha de Freitas Melhem, Jaqueline Machado Soares, Daniela Caetano Gonçalves
article en

Abstract

Background: Equations for estimating energy expenditure are developed for specific populations and contexts, including clinical settings, body composition variations, and age groups, to enhance precision in nutritional planning and health promotion. Objective: To compare the estimated daily energy requirements using the equations from the 2005 and 2023 Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy in sedentary adults and elderly individuals. Methods: A cross-sectional, retrospective study analyzed data from records at a university outpatient clinic using convenience sampling. Participants included sedentary individuals aged 20 years or older of both sexes. The comparison was conducted using repeated measures Analysis of Variance (rmANOVA). Results: Data from 431 individuals (80% female, mean age 43.57 ± 17.30 years) were analyzed. The 2023 equations provided higher energy estimates compared to the 2005 equations. The rmANOVA revealed a significant difference between the energy estimates (F(1, 429) = 1567.24, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.02), with the 2023 equations consistently yielding higher values. Conclusions: The results indicate that the estimated energy requirements significantly increased in the 2023 equations compared with those of 2005, highlighting their relevance to clinical practice.

ObesitiesVol. 5(1)
Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.