Party Systems, Democratic Positions, and Regime Changes: Introducing the Party-System Democracy Index

Abstract One of the most important global political developments is the current wave of autocratization. Most research identifies this as an executive-led process, while others highlight the role opposition actors play in resisting it. We combine this work into a common framework asking, how (anti-)democratic are party systems? Party-system literature emphasises and measures policy differences, while we conceptualise party systems’ democratic positions highlighting to what extent divergent regime preferences are prevalent across parties. To estimate this dimension, we introduce the Party-System Democracy Index (PSDI), capable of tracking regime preferences across party systems from 1970 to 2019 across 178 countries and 3,151 country-years. We implement well-established content, convergent, and construct validity tests to confirm the PSDI’s reliability. Finally, we also show that the PSDI is an important predictor for regime changes in either direction and that changes in the PSDI can signal a looming regime change. This work provides a new framework for studying regime changes and contributes to the renewal of the party-systems literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Political Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123424000887
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
42.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Party Systems, Democratic Positions, and Regime Changes: Introducing the Party-System Democracy Index

Fabio Angiolillo, Felix Wiebrecht, Staffan I. Lindberg
5 citations
British Journal of Political Science
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
42.61
article

Party Systems, Democratic Positions, and Regime Changes: Introducing the Party-System Democracy Index

Fabio Angiolillo, Felix Wiebrecht, Staffan I. Lindberg
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract One of the most important global political developments is the current wave of autocratization. Most research identifies this as an executive-led process, while others highlight the role opposition actors play in resisting it. We combine this work into a common framework asking, how (anti-)democratic are party systems? Party-system literature emphasises and measures policy differences, while we conceptualise party systems’ democratic positions highlighting to what extent divergent regime preferences are prevalent across parties. To estimate this dimension, we introduce the Party-System Democracy Index (PSDI), capable of tracking regime preferences across party systems from 1970 to 2019 across 178 countries and 3,151 country-years. We implement well-established content, convergent, and construct validity tests to confirm the PSDI’s reliability. Finally, we also show that the PSDI is an important predictor for regime changes in either direction and that changes in the PSDI can signal a looming regime change. This work provides a new framework for studying regime changes and contributes to the renewal of the party-systems literature.

British Journal of Political ScienceVol. 55
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Gothenburg (SE)
American Political Science Association, Aarhus Universitet, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Vetenskapsrådet, Göteborgs Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
42.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.