Determining Experts’ Neutral Weights Based on Cross Entropy-Like and Application in Evaluation with Incomplete Judgment Information

In order to mitigate the impact of systematic errors on evaluation results, the T-score method (standard score method) is widely employed at present. However, the underlying assumption for using this method is that the level distribution of contest entries reviewed by each expert remains consistent, which becomes challenging to achieve in evaluations with incomplete judgment information and consequently introduces significant errors in the evaluation outcomes. This study aims to address these limitations of the T-score method by introducing a weighting approach to enhance judging accuracy. To accomplish this objective, we introduce a novel concept called cross entropy-like based on cross entropy and propose a methodology for determining neutral weights of experts based on cross entropy-like. The reliability and scientific rigor of our proposed approach are validated through simulation experiments and comparative analysis against alternative methods. This study has important implications for the fair evaluations with incomplete judgment information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622025500385
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining Experts’ Neutral Weights Based on Cross Entropy-Like and Application in Evaluation with Incomplete Judgment Information

Dongwei Guo, Xuan Zhang, Yulei Chen, Yingming Zhu
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Determining Experts’ Neutral Weights Based on Cross Entropy-Like and Application in Evaluation with Incomplete Judgment Information

Dongwei Guo, Xuan Zhang, Yulei Chen, Yingming Zhu
article en

Abstract

In order to mitigate the impact of systematic errors on evaluation results, the T-score method (standard score method) is widely employed at present. However, the underlying assumption for using this method is that the level distribution of contest entries reviewed by each expert remains consistent, which becomes challenging to achieve in evaluations with incomplete judgment information and consequently introduces significant errors in the evaluation outcomes. This study aims to address these limitations of the T-score method by introducing a weighting approach to enhance judging accuracy. To accomplish this objective, we introduce a novel concept called cross entropy-like based on cross entropy and propose a methodology for determining neutral weights of experts based on cross entropy-like. The reliability and scientific rigor of our proposed approach are validated through simulation experiments and comparative analysis against alternative methods. This study has important implications for the fair evaluations with incomplete judgment information.

International Journal of Information Technology & Decision MakingVol. 25(01)
Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN), Zhoukou Normal University (CN), Weifang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.