The concept of ‘nature’ in chemistry in a digital and ecological age

Abstract The chemical understanding of ‘nature’ is a naturalistic one where ‘nature’—understood as the chemical dynamics that guide material change—coincides with chemical reality and possibility. A naturalistic chemist considers all chemical substances equally ‘natural’, and more importantly also all possible substances. I characterize the first point as the ‘monistic’ and the second as the ‘potentialistic’ understanding of ‘nature’ in chemistry. I argue that this notion of ‘nature’ is ecologically vacuous and lies at the heart of the ecological havoc that modern chemistry is causing. Not only because of these ecological concerns but also because of the increasing digitization of chemistry is the chemical self-image as a ‘synthesis science’ at a crossroads. In the digital age, I claim, chemistry is increasingly becoming a ‘simulation science’. I evaluate these developments from an ecological perspective. In a recourse of ecological visions of chemistry, I outline possibilities of synergies between an ecological and a digital transformation of chemistry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foundations of Chemistry
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-025-09536-2
Primary Topic
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The concept of ‘nature’ in chemistry in a digital and ecological age

Christian Schnurr
Foundations of Chemistry
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
article

The concept of ‘nature’ in chemistry in a digital and ecological age

Christian Schnurr
article en

Abstract

Abstract The chemical understanding of ‘nature’ is a naturalistic one where ‘nature’—understood as the chemical dynamics that guide material change—coincides with chemical reality and possibility. A naturalistic chemist considers all chemical substances equally ‘natural’, and more importantly also all possible substances. I characterize the first point as the ‘monistic’ and the second as the ‘potentialistic’ understanding of ‘nature’ in chemistry. I argue that this notion of ‘nature’ is ecologically vacuous and lies at the heart of the ecological havoc that modern chemistry is causing. Not only because of these ecological concerns but also because of the increasing digitization of chemistry is the chemical self-image as a ‘synthesis science’ at a crossroads. In the digital age, I claim, chemistry is increasingly becoming a ‘simulation science’. I evaluate these developments from an ecological perspective. In a recourse of ecological visions of chemistry, I outline possibilities of synergies between an ecological and a digital transformation of chemistry.

Foundations of ChemistryVol. 27(2)
University of Augsburg (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Elitenetzwerk Bayern
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The concept of ‘nature’ in chemistry in a digital and ecological age — Christian Schnurr · Foundations of Chemistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS