The cultures of science quadrant: Scientific representations, practices and conventions in the East and West

This paper considers the notions of common sense and interobjectivity to articulate an understanding of how different cultural realities give rise to different construals of scientific phenomena across distinct cultures. Our main focus in this paper is on the social sciences. We propose a quadrant of different cultural–scientific stances from which the study of social phenomena is possible, based on the emic–etic dimension pertaining to the study of culture from contrasting perspectives. Although the emic–etic distinction is normally applied in fields within the science of culture, it is proposed here that the distinction is in some ways germane to scientific practice in general, making it amenable for use in a culture of science (CoS) programme. The four perspectives that emerge from the quadrant are illustrated using exemplars. Different aspects of CoS—that is, scientific practice , scientific conventions and representations of science—are then discussed in further detail, including in two tables illustrating points of convergence and divergence between the East and West when it comes to different aspects of CoS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cultures of Science
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20966083251323996
Primary Topic
Social Representations and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The cultures of science quadrant: Scientific representations, practices and conventions in the East and West

Stavroula Tsirogianni, Gordon Sammut, Luke J. Buhagiar
Cultures of Science
Social Representations and Identity
article

The cultures of science quadrant: Scientific representations, practices and conventions in the East and West

Stavroula Tsirogianni, Gordon Sammut, Luke J. Buhagiar
article en

Abstract

This paper considers the notions of common sense and interobjectivity to articulate an understanding of how different cultural realities give rise to different construals of scientific phenomena across distinct cultures. Our main focus in this paper is on the social sciences. We propose a quadrant of different cultural–scientific stances from which the study of social phenomena is possible, based on the emic–etic dimension pertaining to the study of culture from contrasting perspectives. Although the emic–etic distinction is normally applied in fields within the science of culture, it is proposed here that the distinction is in some ways germane to scientific practice in general, making it amenable for use in a culture of science (CoS) programme. The four perspectives that emerge from the quadrant are illustrated using exemplars. Different aspects of CoS—that is, scientific practice , scientific conventions and representations of science—are then discussed in further detail, including in two tables illustrating points of convergence and divergence between the East and West when it comes to different aspects of CoS.

Cultures of ScienceVol. 8(2)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Malta (MT), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Social Representations and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The cultures of science quadrant: Scientific representations, practices and conventions in the East and West — Stavroula Tsirogianni, Gordon Sammut, et al. · Cultures of Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS