Invasores, colonizadores y autóctonos

This essay tries to present some ideas about symbolic and conceptual framework of the narrative scheme of biological conservationism, especially the classic nativist duality that categorizes animals as introduced (invaders)/native; of its limitations, contradictions, and rhetorical strategies, and well as its recent transformation forced by the experience of the processes unleashed by globalization. In this way, I will attend to the corporate and paradigmatic dispute that underlies the controversy between conceptual frameworks and between proposals for action: that struggle between 'originist' (or nativist) conservationists and pragmatists, and between the former and other groups for the prevalence in public and institutional opinion of its own imaginary, narrative and normative proposals, about the nature and regulation of the relationships between human (cultural) action and the environment. I will pay attention to what such a dispute may imply as a struggle to deploy biopower on a large scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antropología Experimental
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17561/rae.v25.9538
Primary Topic
Historical Studies in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invasores, colonizadores y autóctonos

Enrique Couceiro Domínguez
Antropología Experimental
Historical Studies in Latin America
article

Invasores, colonizadores y autóctonos

Enrique Couceiro Domínguez
article en

Abstract

This essay tries to present some ideas about symbolic and conceptual framework of the narrative scheme of biological conservationism, especially the classic nativist duality that categorizes animals as introduced (invaders)/native; of its limitations, contradictions, and rhetorical strategies, and well as its recent transformation forced by the experience of the processes unleashed by globalization. In this way, I will attend to the corporate and paradigmatic dispute that underlies the controversy between conceptual frameworks and between proposals for action: that struggle between 'originist' (or nativist) conservationists and pragmatists, and between the former and other groups for the prevalence in public and institutional opinion of its own imaginary, narrative and normative proposals, about the nature and regulation of the relationships between human (cultural) action and the environment. I will pay attention to what such a dispute may imply as a struggle to deploy biopower on a large scale.

Antropología Experimental(25)
Universal Display Corporation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Historical Studies in Latin America
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.