Bibliometric analysis of economic resilience to disaster studies in 2004-2023 using VOSviewer

Abstract This literature review used bibliometrics to investigate the current development and evolution trends of economic resilience (ER) in disaster studies based on the Scopus database with the sample years from 2004–2023. Search by relevant keywords through digital journals returned 247 documents authored by 232 authors in 36 countries and published in 72 sources. Screening with several inclusion and exclusion criteria obtained 102 documents. Bibliometric analyses were then performed to identify the current research trends and determine future ER research directions. The main findings are as follows. Based on the number of publications and most frequently used keywords, the ER research in disaster studies evolved in three stages: definition of ER in disasters (emergence, 2004–2010), ER assessment (acknowledgment, 2011–2017), and evaluation and development (rapid growth, 2018–2023). A. Rose and C.S. Holling are the most productive authors who contributed the most works to ER research. The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction and Natural Hazards has the most cited publications in ER studies. The United States and China are the first and second-most productive countries in document publications. The ER research direction suggests that one of the topics research projects should be ER in disaster cases in an empirical situation such as forest disaster, pandemic COVID-19, or a Japanese earthquake in a developing country to enhance household resilience with the economic geography approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1462/1/012009
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Regional resilience and development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bibliometric analysis of economic resilience to disaster studies in 2004-2023 using VOSviewer

Agus Joko Pitoyo, Ika Afianita Suherningtyas, Prima Widayani
1 citations
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
Regional resilience and development
4.98
article

Bibliometric analysis of economic resilience to disaster studies in 2004-2023 using VOSviewer

Agus Joko Pitoyo, Ika Afianita Suherningtyas, Prima Widayani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This literature review used bibliometrics to investigate the current development and evolution trends of economic resilience (ER) in disaster studies based on the Scopus database with the sample years from 2004–2023. Search by relevant keywords through digital journals returned 247 documents authored by 232 authors in 36 countries and published in 72 sources. Screening with several inclusion and exclusion criteria obtained 102 documents. Bibliometric analyses were then performed to identify the current research trends and determine future ER research directions. The main findings are as follows. Based on the number of publications and most frequently used keywords, the ER research in disaster studies evolved in three stages: definition of ER in disasters (emergence, 2004–2010), ER assessment (acknowledgment, 2011–2017), and evaluation and development (rapid growth, 2018–2023). A. Rose and C.S. Holling are the most productive authors who contributed the most works to ER research. The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction and Natural Hazards has the most cited publications in ER studies. The United States and China are the first and second-most productive countries in document publications. The ER research direction suggests that one of the topics research projects should be ER in disaster cases in an empirical situation such as forest disaster, pandemic COVID-19, or a Japanese earthquake in a developing country to enhance household resilience with the economic geography approach.

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceVol. 1462(1)
Yogyakarta State University (ID), Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Regional resilience and development
4.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.