Energy recovery analysis through numerical simulations of steam injection in continental shale oil reservoirs

In-situ steam injection is a promising method for shale oil extraction from continental reservoirs, addressing China’s growing energy demands. However, optimizing energy utilization to maximize hydrocarbon production remains a significant challenge, particularly in the context of current energy limitations. This study compares two steam injection strategies using a thermal-flow-chemical (TFC) simulator to assess energy recovery efficiency. The first strategy involves continuous steam injection with simultaneous production, while the second introduces a hydrocarbon production phase after injection. Results show that stimulating the production area is critical for achieving high energy recovery ratios in both strategies. Energy recovery is primarily influenced by the interaction between the decomposition front and the reservoir’s thermal and physical properties. Low injection rates with extended periods enhance hydrocarbon generation by approximately 66%, although they require high energy inputs. In contrast, an optimized injection rate in two-phase strategies increases hydrocarbon recovery by up to 90%. Continuous injection prioritizes immediate production but demands higher energy, while two-phase injection focuses on short-term energy accumulation, improving recovery by 30% when injection rate and duration are optimized. Continuous injection risks oversaturating the reservoir, increasing energy losses, and reducing production efficiency. The two-phase strategy, with its favorable fluid distribution and higher remaining energy ratio, offers better potential for sustained production and energy recovery in subsequent treatments. This work introduces an approach to optimizing steam injection strategies from an energy perspective, offering valuable insights for enhancing energy efficiency and resource recovery in shale oil production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-025-01970-4
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy recovery analysis through numerical simulations of steam injection in continental shale oil reservoirs

Bo Zheng, Xiao Li, Shouding Li, Zhaobin Zhang et al.
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Energy recovery analysis through numerical simulations of steam injection in continental shale oil reservoirs

Bo Zheng, Xiao Li, Shouding Li, Zhaobin Zhang, Maryelin Josefina Briceño Montilla, Yanzhi Hu, Jianming He
article en

Abstract

In-situ steam injection is a promising method for shale oil extraction from continental reservoirs, addressing China’s growing energy demands. However, optimizing energy utilization to maximize hydrocarbon production remains a significant challenge, particularly in the context of current energy limitations. This study compares two steam injection strategies using a thermal-flow-chemical (TFC) simulator to assess energy recovery efficiency. The first strategy involves continuous steam injection with simultaneous production, while the second introduces a hydrocarbon production phase after injection. Results show that stimulating the production area is critical for achieving high energy recovery ratios in both strategies. Energy recovery is primarily influenced by the interaction between the decomposition front and the reservoir’s thermal and physical properties. Low injection rates with extended periods enhance hydrocarbon generation by approximately 66%, although they require high energy inputs. In contrast, an optimized injection rate in two-phase strategies increases hydrocarbon recovery by up to 90%. Continuous injection prioritizes immediate production but demands higher energy, while two-phase injection focuses on short-term energy accumulation, improving recovery by 30% when injection rate and duration are optimized. Continuous injection risks oversaturating the reservoir, increasing energy losses, and reducing production efficiency. The two-phase strategy, with its favorable fluid distribution and higher remaining energy ratio, offers better potential for sustained production and energy recovery in subsequent treatments. This work introduces an approach to optimizing steam injection strategies from an energy perspective, offering valuable insights for enhancing energy efficiency and resource recovery in shale oil production.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production TechnologyVol. 15(4)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geology and Geophysics (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.