Effects on Force, Velocity, Power, and Muscle Activation of Resistances with Variable Inertia Generated by Programmable Electromechanical Motors During Explosive Chest Press Exercises

Strength training machines incorporating advanced electro-mechanical technologies can produce hybrid resistances with variable inertia, such as a resistance that progressively changes from gravitational (inertial) to pneumatic (non-inertial) across the range of motion (ROM). To explore the biomechanical effects of these innovative resistances, a robotic chest press machine was programmed to offer three distinct inertial profiles: gravitational-type constant inertia throughout the ROM (I<sub>FULL</sub>); no inertia (I<sub>ZERO</sub>); and linearly descending inertia across the ROM (I<sub>VAR</sub>). Ten healthy adults performed five maximal-effort, explosive chest press movements under each inertial profile at 30, 50 and 70% of their one-repetition maximum. During each trial, muscle activity of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii was recorded, along with force, velocity and power outputs from the machine. Statistical non-parametric maps based on two-way repeated measures ANOVA were used to assess the effects of load level and inertial profile on the collected time series. Higher load levels consistently led to increased force and reduced velocity and power outcomes over large parts of the ROM. Compared to I<sub>FULL</sub>, I<sub>ZERO</sub> allowed for greater velocity at the expense of lower force throughout the ROM, while I<sub>VAR</sub> produced higher force and power outputs despite having lower velocity than I<sub>ZERO</sub>. Additionally, both I<sub>ZERO</sub> and I<sub>VAR</sub> significantly increased triceps brachii activity at the end of the ROM compared to I<sub>FULL</sub>. I<sub>VAR</sub> outperformed both I<sub>FULL</sub> and I<sub>ZERO</sub> in terms of force and power. Coaches and therapists are advised to consider variable inertial profiles as a key parameter when designing exercise programs for athletes or patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030292
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects on Force, Velocity, Power, and Muscle Activation of Resistances with Variable Inertia Generated by Programmable Electromechanical Motors During Explosive Chest Press Exercises

A. Biscarini, Luca Zoffoli, Silvano Zanuso
1 citations
Bioengineering
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
0.67
article

Effects on Force, Velocity, Power, and Muscle Activation of Resistances with Variable Inertia Generated by Programmable Electromechanical Motors During Explosive Chest Press Exercises

A. Biscarini, Luca Zoffoli, Silvano Zanuso
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Strength training machines incorporating advanced electro-mechanical technologies can produce hybrid resistances with variable inertia, such as a resistance that progressively changes from gravitational (inertial) to pneumatic (non-inertial) across the range of motion (ROM). To explore the biomechanical effects of these innovative resistances, a robotic chest press machine was programmed to offer three distinct inertial profiles: gravitational-type constant inertia throughout the ROM (I<sub>FULL</sub>); no inertia (I<sub>ZERO</sub>); and linearly descending inertia across the ROM (I<sub>VAR</sub>). Ten healthy adults performed five maximal-effort, explosive chest press movements under each inertial profile at 30, 50 and 70% of their one-repetition maximum. During each trial, muscle activity of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii was recorded, along with force, velocity and power outputs from the machine. Statistical non-parametric maps based on two-way repeated measures ANOVA were used to assess the effects of load level and inertial profile on the collected time series. Higher load levels consistently led to increased force and reduced velocity and power outcomes over large parts of the ROM. Compared to I<sub>FULL</sub>, I<sub>ZERO</sub> allowed for greater velocity at the expense of lower force throughout the ROM, while I<sub>VAR</sub> produced higher force and power outputs despite having lower velocity than I<sub>ZERO</sub>. Additionally, both I<sub>ZERO</sub> and I<sub>VAR</sub> significantly increased triceps brachii activity at the end of the ROM compared to I<sub>FULL</sub>. I<sub>VAR</sub> outperformed both I<sub>FULL</sub> and I<sub>ZERO</sub> in terms of force and power. Coaches and therapists are advised to consider variable inertial profiles as a key parameter when designing exercise programs for athletes or patients.

BioengineeringVol. 12(3)
Edith Cowan University (AU), University of Perugia (IT), Technobiochip (Italy) (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.