A minoritarian approach to mental infrastructures

This article attempts to provide a definition of “mental infrastructure” that would be compatible with some of the lessons drawn from disability studies as they have flourished over the past decades. It does so by taking as a test case the “attentional crisis” much discussed in recent years. We start by surveying canonical definitions of infrastructural power, showing how most of them already take into account a complex entanglement between material, institutional and imaginary realities. A second section considers more specifically the mental aspect of infrastructural assemblages, while a third one revisits them under the minoritarian light shed by disability studies. “Repairing” our mental infrastructures, as observed in the field of attention studies, does not merely aim at “recovering” a mental ability for idealized concentration: it rather calls for communicational infrastructures capable of putting multiple (minoritarian and majoritarian) perspectives “on par with” each other. A final section identifies six moves which can help construct the multi-perspectivist mental infrastructures we desperately need in order to remantle our cognitively dissonant worldviews and to negotiate a just cohabitation on planet Earth in the Anthropocene.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Classical Sociology
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795x251327055
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A minoritarian approach to mental infrastructures

Enrico Campo, Yves Citton
Journal of Classical Sociology
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

A minoritarian approach to mental infrastructures

Enrico Campo, Yves Citton
article en

Abstract

This article attempts to provide a definition of “mental infrastructure” that would be compatible with some of the lessons drawn from disability studies as they have flourished over the past decades. It does so by taking as a test case the “attentional crisis” much discussed in recent years. We start by surveying canonical definitions of infrastructural power, showing how most of them already take into account a complex entanglement between material, institutional and imaginary realities. A second section considers more specifically the mental aspect of infrastructural assemblages, while a third one revisits them under the minoritarian light shed by disability studies. “Repairing” our mental infrastructures, as observed in the field of attention studies, does not merely aim at “recovering” a mental ability for idealized concentration: it rather calls for communicational infrastructures capable of putting multiple (minoritarian and majoritarian) perspectives “on par with” each other. A final section identifies six moves which can help construct the multi-perspectivist mental infrastructures we desperately need in order to remantle our cognitively dissonant worldviews and to negotiate a just cohabitation on planet Earth in the Anthropocene.

Journal of Classical SociologyVol. 25(2)
Université Paris 8 (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Institut Universitaire de France
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A minoritarian approach to mental infrastructures — Enrico Campo, Yves Citton · Journal of Classical Sociology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS