Multilabel Classification for Entry-Dependent Expert Selection in Distributed Gaussian Processes

By distributing the training process, local approximation reduces the cost of the standard Gaussian process. An ensemble method aggregates predictions from local Gaussian experts, each trained on different data partitions, under the assumption of perfect diversity among them. While this assumption ensures tractable aggregation, it is frequently violated in practice. Although ensemble methods provide consistent results by modeling dependencies among experts, they incur a high computational cost, scaling cubically with the number of experts. Implementing an expert-selection strategy reduces the number of experts involved in the final aggregation step, thereby improving efficiency. However, selection approaches that assign a fixed set of experts to each data point cannot account for the unique properties of individual data points. This paper introduces a flexible expert-selection approach tailored to the characteristics of individual data points. To achieve this, we frame the selection task as a multi-label classification problem in which experts define the labels, and each data point is associated with specific experts. We discuss in detail the prediction quality, efficiency, and asymptotic properties of the proposed solution. We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method through extensive numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets. This strategy is easily extendable to distributed learning scenarios and multi-agent models, regardless of Gaussian assumptions regarding the experts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entropy
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/e27030307
Primary Topic
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multilabel Classification for Entry-Dependent Expert Selection in Distributed Gaussian Processes

Gjergji Kasneci, Hamed Jalali
Entropy
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
article

Multilabel Classification for Entry-Dependent Expert Selection in Distributed Gaussian Processes

Gjergji Kasneci, Hamed Jalali
article en

Abstract

By distributing the training process, local approximation reduces the cost of the standard Gaussian process. An ensemble method aggregates predictions from local Gaussian experts, each trained on different data partitions, under the assumption of perfect diversity among them. While this assumption ensures tractable aggregation, it is frequently violated in practice. Although ensemble methods provide consistent results by modeling dependencies among experts, they incur a high computational cost, scaling cubically with the number of experts. Implementing an expert-selection strategy reduces the number of experts involved in the final aggregation step, thereby improving efficiency. However, selection approaches that assign a fixed set of experts to each data point cannot account for the unique properties of individual data points. This paper introduces a flexible expert-selection approach tailored to the characteristics of individual data points. To achieve this, we frame the selection task as a multi-label classification problem in which experts define the labels, and each data point is associated with specific experts. We discuss in detail the prediction quality, efficiency, and asymptotic properties of the proposed solution. We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method through extensive numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets. This strategy is easily extendable to distributed learning scenarios and multi-agent models, regardless of Gaussian assumptions regarding the experts.

EntropyVol. 27(3)
Technical University of Munich (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.