405 AI Image Analysis of Lumbar MRI to Automate Extraction of Vertebral Bone Quality Score

INTRODUCTION: Bone health is a crucial predictor of spine surgical outcomes. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the gold standard for measuring bone mineral density (BMD), it is often unavailable preoperatively and can overestimate BMD in patients with spinal degenerative disease and obesity. The MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score correlates strongly with DEXA T-scores and predicts osteoporotic fractures and postoperative outcomes, and is an alternative that exposes the patient to less radiation than Hounsfield Unit measurement from CT. However, VBQ calculation is time-consuming, requires expertise, and is subject to variability. To date, no studies have assessed automated VBQ extraction. METHODS: We conducted a multisite retrospective analysis using T1-weighted MRI scans from the SPIDER challenge dataset, involving 257 patients. The dataset was divided into training (n=179), validation (n=39), and test (n=39) sets. On 10 test images the VBQ score was manually calculated. A 2D U-Net convolutional neural network was trained to segment L1-L4 vertebrae and the spinal canal. Average signal intensity of vertebrae (SIL1-L4) was determined by finding the largest oval that fit inside each vertebrae and reducing the radius to exclude cortical bone. SICSF was calculated by using the median intensity in a 1 cm diameter circle in the spinal canal directly posterior to the L3 vertebra. RESULTS: The AI algorithm achieved a mean Dice score of 0.92 (±0.05) for vertebrae segmentation and 0.92 (±0.03) for spinal canal segmentation on the test set. The mean difference of VBQ score with automated vs manual calculation was +0.13 (±0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our AI-based method significantly improves the accuracy, efficiency, and standardization of VBQ score extraction from MRI’s. If refined, incorporation into electronic health records to create evidence-based risk calculators could identify osteoporotic patients at high risk for poor surgical outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_405
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

405 AI Image Analysis of Lumbar MRI to Automate Extraction of Vertebral Bone Quality Score

Nisha Jayasuriya, Emily Feng, Mohamad Bydon, Karim Rizwan Nathani et al.
Neurosurgery
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

405 AI Image Analysis of Lumbar MRI to Automate Extraction of Vertebral Bone Quality Score

Nisha Jayasuriya, Emily Feng, Mohamad Bydon, Karim Rizwan Nathani, Brett A. Freedman, Laura A. Machlab
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bone health is a crucial predictor of spine surgical outcomes. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the gold standard for measuring bone mineral density (BMD), it is often unavailable preoperatively and can overestimate BMD in patients with spinal degenerative disease and obesity. The MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score correlates strongly with DEXA T-scores and predicts osteoporotic fractures and postoperative outcomes, and is an alternative that exposes the patient to less radiation than Hounsfield Unit measurement from CT. However, VBQ calculation is time-consuming, requires expertise, and is subject to variability. To date, no studies have assessed automated VBQ extraction. METHODS: We conducted a multisite retrospective analysis using T1-weighted MRI scans from the SPIDER challenge dataset, involving 257 patients. The dataset was divided into training (n=179), validation (n=39), and test (n=39) sets. On 10 test images the VBQ score was manually calculated. A 2D U-Net convolutional neural network was trained to segment L1-L4 vertebrae and the spinal canal. Average signal intensity of vertebrae (SIL1-L4) was determined by finding the largest oval that fit inside each vertebrae and reducing the radius to exclude cortical bone. SICSF was calculated by using the median intensity in a 1 cm diameter circle in the spinal canal directly posterior to the L3 vertebra. RESULTS: The AI algorithm achieved a mean Dice score of 0.92 (±0.05) for vertebrae segmentation and 0.92 (±0.03) for spinal canal segmentation on the test set. The mean difference of VBQ score with automated vs manual calculation was +0.13 (±0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our AI-based method significantly improves the accuracy, efficiency, and standardization of VBQ score extraction from MRI’s. If refined, incorporation into electronic health records to create evidence-based risk calculators could identify osteoporotic patients at high risk for poor surgical outcomes.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.