Validity and reliability of the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer in the evaluation of ankle, knee and hip range of motion

Background: Range of motion (ROM) is essential for diagnosing limitations from musculoskeletal issues, developing treatment plans, and monitoring treatment progress. ROM assessments commonly involve tools like universal goniometers, evaluation scales, inclinometers, and smartphone applications. Objective: This study aimed to test the validity of the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer in evaluating lower extremity ROM by comparing it with the universal goniometer and examining the inter-rater and test-retest reliability. Methods: Fifty-one healthy volunteers (aged 18 - 25 years) were included in this study. The lower extremity ROM values of each participant were assessed by two assessors separately using a KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer. The same assessors repeated the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer measurements once to examine test-retest reliability. Lower extremity ROM values were also assessed by one assessor using a universal goniometer. Results: According to the study findings, both the inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer device in all ROMs of the lower extremities were excellent (ICC > 0.80). In addition, the ROM values of the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer device and the ROM values of the universal goniometer in the same joint were highly correlated (r > 0.80, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer is a valid and reliable device for evaluating lower extremity ROM

Publication Details

Journal
Health Sciences Investigations Journal
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46829/hsijournal.2024.12.6.2.977-982
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and reliability of the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer in the evaluation of ankle, knee and hip range of motion

2 citations
Health Sciences Investigations Journal
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
1.15
article

Validity and reliability of the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer in the evaluation of ankle, knee and hip range of motion

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background: Range of motion (ROM) is essential for diagnosing limitations from musculoskeletal issues, developing treatment plans, and monitoring treatment progress. ROM assessments commonly involve tools like universal goniometers, evaluation scales, inclinometers, and smartphone applications. Objective: This study aimed to test the validity of the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer in evaluating lower extremity ROM by comparing it with the universal goniometer and examining the inter-rater and test-retest reliability. Methods: Fifty-one healthy volunteers (aged 18 - 25 years) were included in this study. The lower extremity ROM values of each participant were assessed by two assessors separately using a KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer. The same assessors repeated the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer measurements once to examine test-retest reliability. Lower extremity ROM values were also assessed by one assessor using a universal goniometer. Results: According to the study findings, both the inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer device in all ROMs of the lower extremities were excellent (ICC > 0.80). In addition, the ROM values of the KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer device and the ROM values of the universal goniometer in the same joint were highly correlated (r > 0.80, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The KFORCE Sens® electrogoniometer is a valid and reliable device for evaluating lower extremity ROM

Health Sciences Investigations Journal(Volume 6 Issue 2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.