2028 Propensity Matched Analysis of Hospital Outpatient Department versus Ambulatory Surgical Center Outcomes in Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) Study

INTRODUCTION: In an effort to minimize costs, there has been an increased shift in performing elective surgical procedures at ambulatory surgery centers (ASC), and spine surgery is no exception. There is a paucity of literature with direct comparisons between hospital outpatient department (HOPD) and ASC spine procedures within a multi-center study. METHODS: The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) database was queried for patients who underwent outpatient lumbar decompression surgery from January 2021 to June 2023. Patients in the HOPD and ASC cohorts underwent propensity score matching based on BMI, ASA, and number of levels. Subsequent multivariate analysis was then performed to further control for confounding variables. Outcomes measured included adverse events, timing and disposition of discharge, readmissions, and ED presentations. RESULTS: A total of 3,333 patients were included in the multivariate analysis. Compared to HOPDs, ASCs had a higher risk of any complication (IRR = 1.50; CI: 1.17-1.92, p=0.001) which was driven primarily by an increased risk in return to OR (IRR = 2.30; CI: 1.44-3.68, p < 0.001). Differences in risk of re-operation were driven by an increased rate of recurrent disc herniations in the ASC setting (3.27% versus 1.01% in HOPD). There was no significant difference in the risk of surgical site infection, post-operative ED visit, or 30- and 90-day readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing surgery at ASCs may endure a higher risk of complications and reoperations when compared to an outpatient surgery performed in a hospital setting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_2028
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2028 Propensity Matched Analysis of Hospital Outpatient Department versus Ambulatory Surgical Center Outcomes in Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) Study

Doris Tong, Jason M. Schwalb, Jad G. Khalil, Teck-Mun Soo et al.
Neurosurgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

2028 Propensity Matched Analysis of Hospital Outpatient Department versus Ambulatory Surgical Center Outcomes in Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) Study

Doris Tong, Jason M. Schwalb, Jad G. Khalil, Teck-Mun Soo, Miguelangelo Perez-Cruet, Victor Chang, Richard Easton, Edvin Telemi, Ilyas Aleem, Tarek R. Mansour, Daniel Park, Jianhui Hu, Anisse N. Chaker, Dheeraj Kagithala, Anneliese Rademacher, Lonni Schultz, Muwaffak Abdulhak
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In an effort to minimize costs, there has been an increased shift in performing elective surgical procedures at ambulatory surgery centers (ASC), and spine surgery is no exception. There is a paucity of literature with direct comparisons between hospital outpatient department (HOPD) and ASC spine procedures within a multi-center study. METHODS: The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) database was queried for patients who underwent outpatient lumbar decompression surgery from January 2021 to June 2023. Patients in the HOPD and ASC cohorts underwent propensity score matching based on BMI, ASA, and number of levels. Subsequent multivariate analysis was then performed to further control for confounding variables. Outcomes measured included adverse events, timing and disposition of discharge, readmissions, and ED presentations. RESULTS: A total of 3,333 patients were included in the multivariate analysis. Compared to HOPDs, ASCs had a higher risk of any complication (IRR = 1.50; CI: 1.17-1.92, p=0.001) which was driven primarily by an increased risk in return to OR (IRR = 2.30; CI: 1.44-3.68, p < 0.001). Differences in risk of re-operation were driven by an increased rate of recurrent disc herniations in the ASC setting (3.27% versus 1.01% in HOPD). There was no significant difference in the risk of surgical site infection, post-operative ED visit, or 30- and 90-day readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing surgery at ASCs may endure a higher risk of complications and reoperations when compared to an outpatient surgery performed in a hospital setting.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.