1123 Spine Disease Clinical Trial Representation: An Analysis of Racial and Ethnic Diversity

INTRODUCTION: Spine diseases pose a significant burden on individuals' health and quality of life, affecting millions worldwide. However, ensuring diverse representation in spine disease-related clinical trials, particularly concerning race and ethnicity, is essential for developing therapies that are effective and safe for all populations. METHODS: Detailed trial records from all US clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov relating to spine disease that were completed and included patients over the age of 18 were analyzed. Data for race, ethnicity, and gender were collected and compared to the US Census demographic estimates. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted to assess differences in the representation of minority and women participants compared to the overall trial population. RESULTS: 191 clinical trials met our inclusion criteria. From this cohort, we found that only 48.69% of trials reported race and 24.61% reported ethnicity. The only races that had at least 1 participant in most of the studies are Asian (74.47%), Black (75.53%), and White (98.94%). Hispanics (85.96%) and non-Hispanics (87.71%) were reported in a majority of the studies. Many participants were White (87.78%), which exceeded the US Census estimate of White representation (75.5%, p<0.05). Asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic were significantly underrepresented (p<0.05). For gender, women were in most studies and equally represented to male enrollment (p=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: These results are a clear indication of how minorities in spine disease-related clinical trials remain underrepresented relative to the US population even after the Revitalization Act of 1993. For this reason, greater diversity is required for clinical trial enrollment to ensure effective treatment for spinal pathology among all races and ethnicities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_1123
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1123 Spine Disease Clinical Trial Representation: An Analysis of Racial and Ethnic Diversity

Nikhil Dholaria, Yogendra Kumar Gupta, Ali A. Baaj, Daksh Singh et al.
Neurosurgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

1123 Spine Disease Clinical Trial Representation: An Analysis of Racial and Ethnic Diversity

Nikhil Dholaria, Yogendra Kumar Gupta, Ali A. Baaj, Daksh Singh, Sohail Daulat
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Spine diseases pose a significant burden on individuals' health and quality of life, affecting millions worldwide. However, ensuring diverse representation in spine disease-related clinical trials, particularly concerning race and ethnicity, is essential for developing therapies that are effective and safe for all populations. METHODS: Detailed trial records from all US clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov relating to spine disease that were completed and included patients over the age of 18 were analyzed. Data for race, ethnicity, and gender were collected and compared to the US Census demographic estimates. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted to assess differences in the representation of minority and women participants compared to the overall trial population. RESULTS: 191 clinical trials met our inclusion criteria. From this cohort, we found that only 48.69% of trials reported race and 24.61% reported ethnicity. The only races that had at least 1 participant in most of the studies are Asian (74.47%), Black (75.53%), and White (98.94%). Hispanics (85.96%) and non-Hispanics (87.71%) were reported in a majority of the studies. Many participants were White (87.78%), which exceeded the US Census estimate of White representation (75.5%, p<0.05). Asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic were significantly underrepresented (p<0.05). For gender, women were in most studies and equally represented to male enrollment (p=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: These results are a clear indication of how minorities in spine disease-related clinical trials remain underrepresented relative to the US population even after the Revitalization Act of 1993. For this reason, greater diversity is required for clinical trial enrollment to ensure effective treatment for spinal pathology among all races and ethnicities.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

1123 Spine Disease Clinical Trial Representation: An Analysis of Racial and Ethnic Diversity — Nikhil Dholaria, Yogendra Kumar Gupta, et al. · Neurosurgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS