1290 Differences in Safety and Seizure Outcomes Between Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy and Open Surgery for Drug Resistant Epilepsy: A Meta-Analysis of 6267 Patient Data

INTRODUCTION: Open Surgery (OS) has become the standard of care for Drug Resistant Epilepsy (DRE). Similiarly, Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. However, the current comparative evidence is limited to observational cohorts, a meta-analysis is needed to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: A literature search was conducted until March 14, 2024, to identify studies comparing LITT and OS in patients with DRE. The primary outcomes were seizure freedom (SF), length of hospital stay (LOS), and complication rate, with subgroup analysis on adult and pediatric populations. RESULTS: Out of 558 articles, 11 cohort studies and 2 retrospective case series met our inclusion criteria, considering 6267 patients for analysis. Patients who underwent LITT had a significantly shorter LOS (Mean Difference [MD] -3.30 days, 95%CI=-4.46, -2.15, p=<0.00001), and a lower complication rate (Risk ratio [RR] 0.49, 95%CI=0.34, 0.72, p=0.0003) compared to OS. The rates of SF favored OS over LITT(RR 0.77, 95%CI=0.69-0.87, p=<0.0001). However, when we analyzed propensity-score matched studies (RR 0.85, 95%CI=0.63-1.15, p=0.30) and temporal lobe epilepsy in pediatric populations (RR 0.78, 95%CI=0.60-1.01, p=0.06), SF rates were comparable among approaches. Mortality was similar among both therapies (RR 0.40, 95%CI=0.06-3.22, p=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: LITT and OS are effective treatments for patients with DRE. Unmatched-cohort analysis suggest that OS might provide superior benefits in terms of SF, conversely, LITT provided a notable advantage in terms of decreased LOS and lower complication rates. However, propensity-score matched cohorts suggest that both approaches may provide comparable SF outcomes. Studies should evaluate critical variables such as neurocognitive decline and quality of life, as this has been underexplored. Future clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_1290
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1290 Differences in Safety and Seizure Outcomes Between Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy and Open Surgery for Drug Resistant Epilepsy: A Meta-Analysis of 6267 Patient Data

Leonardo Ayala, Percy Rojas, Alder Fernando Valenzuela‐Rangel, E. Gutiérrez et al.
Neurosurgery
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

1290 Differences in Safety and Seizure Outcomes Between Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy and Open Surgery for Drug Resistant Epilepsy: A Meta-Analysis of 6267 Patient Data

Leonardo Ayala, Percy Rojas, Alder Fernando Valenzuela‐Rangel, E. Gutiérrez, Diego Pichardo‐Rojas, César Bigran Espinosa-Cantú, Aldo Barrón Lomelí
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Open Surgery (OS) has become the standard of care for Drug Resistant Epilepsy (DRE). Similiarly, Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. However, the current comparative evidence is limited to observational cohorts, a meta-analysis is needed to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: A literature search was conducted until March 14, 2024, to identify studies comparing LITT and OS in patients with DRE. The primary outcomes were seizure freedom (SF), length of hospital stay (LOS), and complication rate, with subgroup analysis on adult and pediatric populations. RESULTS: Out of 558 articles, 11 cohort studies and 2 retrospective case series met our inclusion criteria, considering 6267 patients for analysis. Patients who underwent LITT had a significantly shorter LOS (Mean Difference [MD] -3.30 days, 95%CI=-4.46, -2.15, p=<0.00001), and a lower complication rate (Risk ratio [RR] 0.49, 95%CI=0.34, 0.72, p=0.0003) compared to OS. The rates of SF favored OS over LITT(RR 0.77, 95%CI=0.69-0.87, p=<0.0001). However, when we analyzed propensity-score matched studies (RR 0.85, 95%CI=0.63-1.15, p=0.30) and temporal lobe epilepsy in pediatric populations (RR 0.78, 95%CI=0.60-1.01, p=0.06), SF rates were comparable among approaches. Mortality was similar among both therapies (RR 0.40, 95%CI=0.06-3.22, p=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: LITT and OS are effective treatments for patients with DRE. Unmatched-cohort analysis suggest that OS might provide superior benefits in terms of SF, conversely, LITT provided a notable advantage in terms of decreased LOS and lower complication rates. However, propensity-score matched cohorts suggest that both approaches may provide comparable SF outcomes. Studies should evaluate critical variables such as neurocognitive decline and quality of life, as this has been underexplored. Future clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.