141 Bone Optimization for the Perioperative Spine Patient: Multidisciplinary Approach at a Single Academic Center

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease that poses challenges in spine surgery due to compromised bone quality. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) found that osteoporotic patients undergoing cervical spine surgery had a greater chance of revision surgeries and costlier hospitalizations. The aging population and increasing lifespan have led to a rise in osteoporosis, necessitating effective perioperative bone density optimization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 204 patients referred to our Bone Liaison Service for spine-related reasons between October 2019 and May 2024. All patients complete an intake questionnaire during this first visit. After a full workup (bone health assessment), patients meet with a member of the Bone Liaison Service to discuss treatment options. The study focused on 72 perioperative patients, examining their demographic data, bone health assessments, treatment modalities, and factors influencing treatment choice. RESULTS: Of the perioperative patients, 76.4% were treated post-surgery, and 23.6% were optimizing their bone health preoperatively. Most patients (83.3%) were prescribed medications, with romosozumab being the most common (43.3%), followed by denosumab (26.7%), abaloparatide (23.3%), and teriparatide (13.3%). Treatment choice was influenced by contraindications (45%), patient preferences (11.7%), and insurance coverage issues (11.7%). Factors such as route of administration, dosing interval, and distance to the clinic also played significant roles. CONCLUSIONS: The optimization of bone health in spine patients is influenced by multiple factors, including medical contraindications, patient preferences, and insurance coverage. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for effective management and optimization of treatment outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of bone health optimization on surgical outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_141
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

141 Bone Optimization for the Perioperative Spine Patient: Multidisciplinary Approach at a Single Academic Center

Corinna C. Zygourakis, Andrea Fox, María Valentina Suárez-Nieto, Karen Malacon
Neurosurgery
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

141 Bone Optimization for the Perioperative Spine Patient: Multidisciplinary Approach at a Single Academic Center

Corinna C. Zygourakis, Andrea Fox, María Valentina Suárez-Nieto, Karen Malacon
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease that poses challenges in spine surgery due to compromised bone quality. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) found that osteoporotic patients undergoing cervical spine surgery had a greater chance of revision surgeries and costlier hospitalizations. The aging population and increasing lifespan have led to a rise in osteoporosis, necessitating effective perioperative bone density optimization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 204 patients referred to our Bone Liaison Service for spine-related reasons between October 2019 and May 2024. All patients complete an intake questionnaire during this first visit. After a full workup (bone health assessment), patients meet with a member of the Bone Liaison Service to discuss treatment options. The study focused on 72 perioperative patients, examining their demographic data, bone health assessments, treatment modalities, and factors influencing treatment choice. RESULTS: Of the perioperative patients, 76.4% were treated post-surgery, and 23.6% were optimizing their bone health preoperatively. Most patients (83.3%) were prescribed medications, with romosozumab being the most common (43.3%), followed by denosumab (26.7%), abaloparatide (23.3%), and teriparatide (13.3%). Treatment choice was influenced by contraindications (45%), patient preferences (11.7%), and insurance coverage issues (11.7%). Factors such as route of administration, dosing interval, and distance to the clinic also played significant roles. CONCLUSIONS: The optimization of bone health in spine patients is influenced by multiple factors, including medical contraindications, patient preferences, and insurance coverage. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for effective management and optimization of treatment outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of bone health optimization on surgical outcomes.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

141 Bone Optimization for the Perioperative Spine Patient: Multidisciplinary Approach at a Single Academic Center — Corinna C. Zygourakis, Andrea Fox, et al. · Neurosurgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS