1075 Comparison of Pain and Functional Outcomes Among Geriatric and Non-Geriatric Adults Following Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: Analysis of a Multi-Center Prospective Cohort

INTRODUCTION: Degenerative spinal conditions requiring surgical intervention are increasing due to an aging global population. Compared to traditional open surgery, full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) champions a rapid recovery. However, its efficacy in elderly patients that might yield additional benefits from minimized invasiveness remains underexplored. METHODS: A multi-institutional prospective observational cohort study was conducted involving patients undergoing elective lumbar FESS. Participants were categorized into non-geriatric (18-69 years old) and geriatric (=70 years old) groups. Studied variables included demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, visual analog scale (VAS) for back and ipsilateral leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). A mobile application was leveraged to collect real-time data preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: 164 patients were included and divided into non-geriatric (N=125) and geriatric (N=39) cohorts. No group differences were observed between sex (p=0.404), BMI (p=0.372), procedure duration (p=0.350), or blood loss (p=0.384). Non-geriatric patients received discectomy more frequently (p<0.001), while older patients underwent more decompressive procedures (p<0.001). Characterization of pain and functional outcome revealed that non-geriatric and geriatric patients follow a similar recovery trajectory and both appreciate significant improvements from baseline to three months postoperatively (p<0.001 for VAS back, VAS leg, ODI). There were no differences in rate of improvement between age groups at any time point (p>0.05 for VAS back, VAS leg, ODI). Lastly, 78% and 82% of non-geriatric and geriatric patients, respectively, had perceived their surgical outcome as ‘good’ at three months, with the remaining deeming it as ‘poor’ (p=0.623). CONCLUSIONS: FESS significantly improves pain and function in both geriatric and non-geriatric adults with degenerative lumbar conditions, with no difference in the degree of improvement between groups. These findings underscore the efficacy of FESS as a minimally invasive surgical option for elderly patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_1075
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1075 Comparison of Pain and Functional Outcomes Among Geriatric and Non-Geriatric Adults Following Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: Analysis of a Multi-Center Prospective Cohort

Rahul A. Sastry, Owen P. Leary, Albert E. Telfeian, Jared Fridley et al.
Neurosurgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

1075 Comparison of Pain and Functional Outcomes Among Geriatric and Non-Geriatric Adults Following Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: Analysis of a Multi-Center Prospective Cohort

Rahul A. Sastry, Owen P. Leary, Albert E. Telfeian, Jared Fridley, Osama N. Kashlan, Jannik Leyendecker, Christoph P. Hofstetter, Peter B. Derman, Sanjay Konakondla, Alexander A. Chernysh, Ziya L. Gokaslan, John Ogunlade
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Degenerative spinal conditions requiring surgical intervention are increasing due to an aging global population. Compared to traditional open surgery, full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) champions a rapid recovery. However, its efficacy in elderly patients that might yield additional benefits from minimized invasiveness remains underexplored. METHODS: A multi-institutional prospective observational cohort study was conducted involving patients undergoing elective lumbar FESS. Participants were categorized into non-geriatric (18-69 years old) and geriatric (=70 years old) groups. Studied variables included demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details, visual analog scale (VAS) for back and ipsilateral leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). A mobile application was leveraged to collect real-time data preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: 164 patients were included and divided into non-geriatric (N=125) and geriatric (N=39) cohorts. No group differences were observed between sex (p=0.404), BMI (p=0.372), procedure duration (p=0.350), or blood loss (p=0.384). Non-geriatric patients received discectomy more frequently (p<0.001), while older patients underwent more decompressive procedures (p<0.001). Characterization of pain and functional outcome revealed that non-geriatric and geriatric patients follow a similar recovery trajectory and both appreciate significant improvements from baseline to three months postoperatively (p<0.001 for VAS back, VAS leg, ODI). There were no differences in rate of improvement between age groups at any time point (p>0.05 for VAS back, VAS leg, ODI). Lastly, 78% and 82% of non-geriatric and geriatric patients, respectively, had perceived their surgical outcome as ‘good’ at three months, with the remaining deeming it as ‘poor’ (p=0.623). CONCLUSIONS: FESS significantly improves pain and function in both geriatric and non-geriatric adults with degenerative lumbar conditions, with no difference in the degree of improvement between groups. These findings underscore the efficacy of FESS as a minimally invasive surgical option for elderly patients.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.