1220 Shorter Hospitalization Observed Following Endoscopic Single-Level Lumbar Decompression Compared to Open Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis Of 2,527 Patients

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic lumbar decompression is a common surgical intervention for radiculopathy, offering potential benefits over open decompression, such as shorter operative times and faster postoperative recovery. Both endoscopic and open approaches improve patient quality of life, but further studies are needed to fully understand the advantages of the increasingly used endoscopic method. METHODS: Patients at an academic medical center who underwent single-level lumbar nerve root decompression from 2019-2023 via the endoscopic approach were compared to those who underwent open decompression during the same period. Data extracted from electronic health records included demographics, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), operative time, LOS, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Student’s t-tests were used to compare differences based on surgical technique. RESULTS: 2527 patients (mean age 60.4 ± 14.8y) underwent lumbar nerve root decompression with either endoscopic (n=112) or open (n=2415) approaches. Endoscopic cases had a significantly lower LOS (0.67 days, IQR: 0 to 1 day) than open cases (1.63 days, IQR: 0 to 2 days), with no significant differences in gender, race, BMI, age, and CCI (p=5.10*10^-8). Patients who underwent endoscopic decompression (-1.55, IQR: -5 to 0) experienced a similar postoperative decrease in pain on the VAS scale as those who had open surgeries (-2.11, IQR: -5 to 0), indicating non-superiority of open approaches compared to fully endoscopic approaches (p=0.083). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic lumbar decompression resulted in shorter hospital stays compared to open techniques, while showing non-inferior improvement in pain scores. The shorter LOS is likely due to reduced tissue trauma from smaller incisions and minimal muscle manipulation. Although pain scores were similar between both methods, the reduced LOS with endoscopic techniques may decrease immediate postoperative healthcare utilization.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_1220
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1220 Shorter Hospitalization Observed Following Endoscopic Single-Level Lumbar Decompression Compared to Open Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis Of 2,527 Patients

Neil R. Malhotra, Dominick Macaluso, Connor A. Wathen, Hasan Shahzad Ahmad et al.
Neurosurgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

1220 Shorter Hospitalization Observed Following Endoscopic Single-Level Lumbar Decompression Compared to Open Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis Of 2,527 Patients

Neil R. Malhotra, Dominick Macaluso, Connor A. Wathen, Hasan Shahzad Ahmad, Ryan Turlip, Paul J. Marcotte, Daksh Chauhan, Yohannes Ghenbot, Jang W. Yoon, Eric L. Zager, John D. Arena, Dmitriy Petrov, Harmon Singh Khela, Mert Marcel Dagli, Omkar Anaspure, Ali K. Ozturk, Kevin Bryan, Zarina S. Ali
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic lumbar decompression is a common surgical intervention for radiculopathy, offering potential benefits over open decompression, such as shorter operative times and faster postoperative recovery. Both endoscopic and open approaches improve patient quality of life, but further studies are needed to fully understand the advantages of the increasingly used endoscopic method. METHODS: Patients at an academic medical center who underwent single-level lumbar nerve root decompression from 2019-2023 via the endoscopic approach were compared to those who underwent open decompression during the same period. Data extracted from electronic health records included demographics, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), operative time, LOS, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Student’s t-tests were used to compare differences based on surgical technique. RESULTS: 2527 patients (mean age 60.4 ± 14.8y) underwent lumbar nerve root decompression with either endoscopic (n=112) or open (n=2415) approaches. Endoscopic cases had a significantly lower LOS (0.67 days, IQR: 0 to 1 day) than open cases (1.63 days, IQR: 0 to 2 days), with no significant differences in gender, race, BMI, age, and CCI (p=5.10*10^-8). Patients who underwent endoscopic decompression (-1.55, IQR: -5 to 0) experienced a similar postoperative decrease in pain on the VAS scale as those who had open surgeries (-2.11, IQR: -5 to 0), indicating non-superiority of open approaches compared to fully endoscopic approaches (p=0.083). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic lumbar decompression resulted in shorter hospital stays compared to open techniques, while showing non-inferior improvement in pain scores. The shorter LOS is likely due to reduced tissue trauma from smaller incisions and minimal muscle manipulation. Although pain scores were similar between both methods, the reduced LOS with endoscopic techniques may decrease immediate postoperative healthcare utilization.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.