181 Comparing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Operative Time in Neurosurgical Procedures: Institutional Versus Nationwide Dataset Approaches

INTRODUCTION: The estimation of operative time for a planned surgery is usually based on the experience of the surgical team or the retrospective studies relevant to the case. Efficient management of operative time and surgical theater utilization is important for hospitals to provide timely and cost-effective patient care. METHODS: We utilized two datasets: one from an institutional cohort and another from the ACS-NSQIP database, with each dataset comprised details of patient and neurosurgical procedures. Due to positively skewed operative time distributions, 5% of the upper end in both datasets were removed as outliers. We applied several ML models, including Linear Regression (LR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression (XGBR), and conducted extensive hyperparameter tuning. Model performance was evaluated using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and R2 metrics. RESULTS: The models developed from the institutional dataset generally provided better predictions (DNN RMSE: 53.44, MAE: 38.33, R2: 0.74; XGBR RMSE: 52.24, MAE: 37.25, R2: 0.76) compared to those from the ACS-NSQIP dataset (XGBR RMSE: 61.98, MAE: 47.90, R2: 0.38). The disparity in model performance highlights the influence of dataset characteristics on predictive accuracy. The XGBR model consistently showed the best performance across both datasets, suggesting its robustness in handling diverse and complex data features. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that while ML models can significantly aid in predicting operative times, the choice of dataset has a profound impact on their effectiveness. Institutional data, with potentially more clinical granularity, tends to enable more accurate predictions. These insights support the hypothesis that institutional-specific models might be more effective for OR scheduling optimizations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_181
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

181 Comparing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Operative Time in Neurosurgical Procedures: Institutional Versus Nationwide Dataset Approaches

Konstantinos Katsos, Mohamad Bydon, Rabih G. Tawk, Hendrik von Kentzinsky et al.
Neurosurgery
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

181 Comparing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Operative Time in Neurosurgical Procedures: Institutional Versus Nationwide Dataset Approaches

Konstantinos Katsos, Mohamad Bydon, Rabih G. Tawk, Hendrik von Kentzinsky, Karim Rizwan Nathani, Sufyan Ibrahim, Brett A. Freedman, Rushna Ali, Archis R. Bhandarkar, Laura A. Machlab
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The estimation of operative time for a planned surgery is usually based on the experience of the surgical team or the retrospective studies relevant to the case. Efficient management of operative time and surgical theater utilization is important for hospitals to provide timely and cost-effective patient care. METHODS: We utilized two datasets: one from an institutional cohort and another from the ACS-NSQIP database, with each dataset comprised details of patient and neurosurgical procedures. Due to positively skewed operative time distributions, 5% of the upper end in both datasets were removed as outliers. We applied several ML models, including Linear Regression (LR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression (XGBR), and conducted extensive hyperparameter tuning. Model performance was evaluated using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and R2 metrics. RESULTS: The models developed from the institutional dataset generally provided better predictions (DNN RMSE: 53.44, MAE: 38.33, R2: 0.74; XGBR RMSE: 52.24, MAE: 37.25, R2: 0.76) compared to those from the ACS-NSQIP dataset (XGBR RMSE: 61.98, MAE: 47.90, R2: 0.38). The disparity in model performance highlights the influence of dataset characteristics on predictive accuracy. The XGBR model consistently showed the best performance across both datasets, suggesting its robustness in handling diverse and complex data features. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that while ML models can significantly aid in predicting operative times, the choice of dataset has a profound impact on their effectiveness. Institutional data, with potentially more clinical granularity, tends to enable more accurate predictions. These insights support the hypothesis that institutional-specific models might be more effective for OR scheduling optimizations.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.