Does U.S. Entity List impel Chinese AI enterprises to exploratory innovation? An external knowledge acquisition perspective

The neoglobalization landscape and geopolitical risks demand novel responses from enterprises regarding their innovation strategies. Existing research has examined the impact of U.S. trade sanctions on the innovation capabilities of Chinese enterprises, yielding conflicting findings of both stimulation and inhibition. However, limited attention has been paid to how sanctions influence enterprise innovation strategies. Critical questions arise in this context: has the preference between exploratory and exploitative innovation strategies shifted among these enterprises, and how are they addressing technological knowledge gaps from trade restrictions? To address these questions, this paper investigates shifts in the exploration-exploitation balance of innovation strategies among Chinese AI enterprises on the U.S. Entity List, and analyzes the mediating effects of external knowledge acquisition, such as foreign patent citations and industry-academia collaborations, on these strategy shifts. Empirical findings from 168 Chinese AI enterprises on the U.S. Entity List reveal that a stronger capacity to acquire external knowledge through domestic industry-academia collaborations correlates with a greater inclination toward exploratory innovation strategies, while reliance on Western patented technology correlates with a reduced inclination toward exploratory innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Strategy & Innovation
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsinno.2025.200536
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does U.S. Entity List impel Chinese AI enterprises to exploratory innovation? An external knowledge acquisition perspective

Wenjie Liu, Ke Wen
2 citations
Journal of Strategy & Innovation
Innovation and Knowledge Management
4.45
article

Does U.S. Entity List impel Chinese AI enterprises to exploratory innovation? An external knowledge acquisition perspective

Wenjie Liu, Ke Wen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The neoglobalization landscape and geopolitical risks demand novel responses from enterprises regarding their innovation strategies. Existing research has examined the impact of U.S. trade sanctions on the innovation capabilities of Chinese enterprises, yielding conflicting findings of both stimulation and inhibition. However, limited attention has been paid to how sanctions influence enterprise innovation strategies. Critical questions arise in this context: has the preference between exploratory and exploitative innovation strategies shifted among these enterprises, and how are they addressing technological knowledge gaps from trade restrictions? To address these questions, this paper investigates shifts in the exploration-exploitation balance of innovation strategies among Chinese AI enterprises on the U.S. Entity List, and analyzes the mediating effects of external knowledge acquisition, such as foreign patent citations and industry-academia collaborations, on these strategy shifts. Empirical findings from 168 Chinese AI enterprises on the U.S. Entity List reveal that a stronger capacity to acquire external knowledge through domestic industry-academia collaborations correlates with a greater inclination toward exploratory innovation strategies, while reliance on Western patented technology correlates with a reduced inclination toward exploratory innovation.

Journal of Strategy & InnovationVol. 36(1)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institutes of Science and Development (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.