272 Comparative Analysis of the Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy, Revision Rate and Screw Loosening in a Single Center Using Fluoroscopy, iCT-Based Navigation and Robotic-Guided Surgery

INTRODUCTION: Pedicle-screw (PS)-instrumentation is a common procedure for the management of degenerative, infectious, oncological spine-diseases with instability and spine-fractures. Free-hand and fluoroscopy-guided PS-placement are traditional methods, whereas navigation-guided PS-placement, either with surface-based matching or automatic registration with intraoperative imaging, additionally robotic-guided PS-placement have emerged in the past two decades. Navigation- and robotic-guided surgery shows increased PS-accuracy-placement. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study includes consecutive cases who underwent PS-placement in one of the three techniques by two surgeons. The placement of each individual PS was evaluated in either iCT or postoperative spine-CT, and subsequently classified using Gertzbein and Robbins-System (GRS), Zadichevsky-classification and Heary-classification. Follow-up post-operative CT-scans were performed at a mean period of 8 months following surgery (IQR=5-17) for routine control and fusion assessment. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients (52.3% men) with a median age of 71 years (IQR:61-79) were included. The most common indication were degenerative pathologies (26.2%) and fractures (25.3%). A total of 1352 PS were placed: 667 (49.3%) with fluoroscopy, 241 (17.8%) with iCT-navigation and 444 (32.8%) with robotic-guidance. 12(0.9%) were cervical PS, 640(47.3%) were thoracal PS, 634(46.9%) were lumbar PS and 66(4.9%) were sacral screws. The GRS (p<0.001), Zadichevsky (p=0.002), and Heary-classifications (p<0.001) differed between techniques. Highest accuracy was in robotic-guided group (GRS A=91.7%), followed by fluoroscopy-assisted (GRS A=86.2%), and iCT-navigated placement (GRS A=80.5%). Postoperative revisions due to misplacement (1.6%, P<0.001) or screw-loosening (2.2%, P=0.001) were associated significantly with iCT-navigated-placement compared to two other methods. Screw-diameter =6.5 mm (AUC=0.608; p<0.001) and pedicle-diameter =12 mm (AUC=0.612; p<0.001) predicted long-term screw-loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-guided-placement of PS has shown higher accuracy, less loosening and decreased revision-rate compared to fluoroscopy-guided or iCT-navigated technique. Morphometric characteristics of screw and pedicle-diameter showed predictive value for long-term screw-loosening.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_272
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

272 Comparative Analysis of the Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy, Revision Rate and Screw Loosening in a Single Center Using Fluoroscopy, iCT-Based Navigation and Robotic-Guided Surgery

Benjamin Saß, Mirza Pojskić, Miriam H. A. Bopp, Christopher Nimsky et al.
Neurosurgery
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

272 Comparative Analysis of the Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy, Revision Rate and Screw Loosening in a Single Center Using Fluoroscopy, iCT-Based Navigation and Robotic-Guided Surgery

Benjamin Saß, Mirza Pojskić, Miriam H. A. Bopp, Christopher Nimsky, Omar Alwakaa, Marco Nesim
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pedicle-screw (PS)-instrumentation is a common procedure for the management of degenerative, infectious, oncological spine-diseases with instability and spine-fractures. Free-hand and fluoroscopy-guided PS-placement are traditional methods, whereas navigation-guided PS-placement, either with surface-based matching or automatic registration with intraoperative imaging, additionally robotic-guided PS-placement have emerged in the past two decades. Navigation- and robotic-guided surgery shows increased PS-accuracy-placement. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study includes consecutive cases who underwent PS-placement in one of the three techniques by two surgeons. The placement of each individual PS was evaluated in either iCT or postoperative spine-CT, and subsequently classified using Gertzbein and Robbins-System (GRS), Zadichevsky-classification and Heary-classification. Follow-up post-operative CT-scans were performed at a mean period of 8 months following surgery (IQR=5-17) for routine control and fusion assessment. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients (52.3% men) with a median age of 71 years (IQR:61-79) were included. The most common indication were degenerative pathologies (26.2%) and fractures (25.3%). A total of 1352 PS were placed: 667 (49.3%) with fluoroscopy, 241 (17.8%) with iCT-navigation and 444 (32.8%) with robotic-guidance. 12(0.9%) were cervical PS, 640(47.3%) were thoracal PS, 634(46.9%) were lumbar PS and 66(4.9%) were sacral screws. The GRS (p<0.001), Zadichevsky (p=0.002), and Heary-classifications (p<0.001) differed between techniques. Highest accuracy was in robotic-guided group (GRS A=91.7%), followed by fluoroscopy-assisted (GRS A=86.2%), and iCT-navigated placement (GRS A=80.5%). Postoperative revisions due to misplacement (1.6%, P<0.001) or screw-loosening (2.2%, P=0.001) were associated significantly with iCT-navigated-placement compared to two other methods. Screw-diameter =6.5 mm (AUC=0.608; p<0.001) and pedicle-diameter =12 mm (AUC=0.612; p<0.001) predicted long-term screw-loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-guided-placement of PS has shown higher accuracy, less loosening and decreased revision-rate compared to fluoroscopy-guided or iCT-navigated technique. Morphometric characteristics of screw and pedicle-diameter showed predictive value for long-term screw-loosening.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.