2054 Comparison of Quality, Empathy and Readability of Physician Responses Versus Chatbot Responses to Common Vascular Neurosurgery-Related Questions on a Social Media Platform

INTRODUCTION: Social media platforms are utilized by patients prior to scheduling formal consultations. They also serve as a means of pursuing second opinions. Vascular pathologies require regular surveillance and specialized care. In recent years, chatbots have been trained using large language models (LLMs) to provide information on neurosurgical conditions. However, their ability to answer vascular neurosurgery-related questions has not been compared to physician responses on social media. METHODS: We identified the top 50 vascular neurosurgery-related questions and subsequent verified physician responses from the Reddit social media platform. These responses were inputted into ChatGPT. Responses were anonymized and ranked on a Likert scale for accuracy regarding neurosurgical guidelines, completeness (ability to address all aspects of the question) and empathy by four independent reviewers. Readability was assessed using standardized indexes (Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch Kincaid Grade, Gunning Fox Index, SMOG Index, Automated Readability Index and Coleman Liau Index). Mean Likert scale ratings and readability were compared using 2-tailed t-tests. RESULTS: Responses provided by ChatGPT were perceived to have significantly higher ratings of completeness (mean ± SD) 2.62 ± 0.64 and empathy 3.96 ± 1.08, compared to physician responses (1.96 ± 0.75 and 2.22 ± 1.02), respectively (P<0.001). Accuracy of healthcare information did not differ significantly. In terms of readability, physician responses had significantly higher ease of readability and lower grade-level readability compared to ChatGPT (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest higher empathy and completeness of information provided by ChatGPT compared to physicians. However, these responses are at readability levels higher than the literacy of the average American population (sixth-grade readability). Future research could emphasize incorporating chatbot responses while drafting physician responses to provide more balanced information to healthcare questions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_2054
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2054 Comparison of Quality, Empathy and Readability of Physician Responses Versus Chatbot Responses to Common Vascular Neurosurgery-Related Questions on a Social Media Platform

Saman Sizdahkhani, Nikolaos Mouchtouris, Robert H. Rosenwasser, Pascal M. Jabbour et al.
Neurosurgery
Social Media in Health Education
article

2054 Comparison of Quality, Empathy and Readability of Physician Responses Versus Chatbot Responses to Common Vascular Neurosurgery-Related Questions on a Social Media Platform

Saman Sizdahkhani, Nikolaos Mouchtouris, Robert H. Rosenwasser, Pascal M. Jabbour, Shyam Majmundar, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Joanna M. Roy, Michael Reid Gooch, Basel Musmar, Elias Atallah, Anand Kaul
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Social media platforms are utilized by patients prior to scheduling formal consultations. They also serve as a means of pursuing second opinions. Vascular pathologies require regular surveillance and specialized care. In recent years, chatbots have been trained using large language models (LLMs) to provide information on neurosurgical conditions. However, their ability to answer vascular neurosurgery-related questions has not been compared to physician responses on social media. METHODS: We identified the top 50 vascular neurosurgery-related questions and subsequent verified physician responses from the Reddit social media platform. These responses were inputted into ChatGPT. Responses were anonymized and ranked on a Likert scale for accuracy regarding neurosurgical guidelines, completeness (ability to address all aspects of the question) and empathy by four independent reviewers. Readability was assessed using standardized indexes (Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch Kincaid Grade, Gunning Fox Index, SMOG Index, Automated Readability Index and Coleman Liau Index). Mean Likert scale ratings and readability were compared using 2-tailed t-tests. RESULTS: Responses provided by ChatGPT were perceived to have significantly higher ratings of completeness (mean ± SD) 2.62 ± 0.64 and empathy 3.96 ± 1.08, compared to physician responses (1.96 ± 0.75 and 2.22 ± 1.02), respectively (P<0.001). Accuracy of healthcare information did not differ significantly. In terms of readability, physician responses had significantly higher ease of readability and lower grade-level readability compared to ChatGPT (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest higher empathy and completeness of information provided by ChatGPT compared to physicians. However, these responses are at readability levels higher than the literacy of the average American population (sixth-grade readability). Future research could emphasize incorporating chatbot responses while drafting physician responses to provide more balanced information to healthcare questions.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Social Media in Health Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.