1253 Machine Learning Approaches for Imputation and Validation of Missing AIS Grades in the Spinal Cord Injury Data Model Systems (SCIMS) Database

INTRODUCTION: The American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) at admission is an important predictor of outcomes following spinal cord injury (tSCI). Nearly 80% of records in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) database—a multicenter, prospective database of SCI patients—lack admission AIS grades. Accurate imputation of this missing data could enable more robust analyses and insights into SCI recovery. METHODS: We included 14,110 SCI patients from the SCIMS database (1988-2020). Five machine learning algorithms—Random Forest (RF), Linear Discriminant Analysis, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, and Support Vector Machines—were compared for imputation accuracy using 5-fold cross-validation. The highest accuracy model (RF) was applied to the entire dataset. We validated the imputed AIS grades by predicting discharge Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores (range 13-91) with simple and multiple linear regression models on a 1:1 propensity-score-matched cohort (n=5,828). Model performance was compared using differences in RMSE with bootstrapped confidence intervals. RESULTS: The full cohort contained a representative distribution of AIS grades (46.0% A, 14.7% B, 19.4% C, 19.8% D), and the propensity-matched cohort characteristics were well-balanced. RF demonstrated the highest validation accuracy, 81.7%. Predictive models showed no significant differences between models using true vs. imputed AIS grades, with the 95%CI for RMSE being [-0.18,0.85] for simple and [-0.28,0.77] for multiple regression models. The coefficients of AIS grades were not significantly different between models with true vs. imputed values. CONCLUSIONS: A data-driven approach to imputation resulted in a robust method for imputing admission AIS that demonstrates clinical validity in the SCIMS database. This approach extends the utility of this longitudinal database and, with validation, may provide a framework for other SCI databases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_1253
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1253 Machine Learning Approaches for Imputation and Validation of Missing AIS Grades in the Spinal Cord Injury Data Model Systems (SCIMS) Database

Daniel Lubelski, Timothy F. Witham, Carlos A. Aude, Tej D. Azad et al.
Neurosurgery
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

1253 Machine Learning Approaches for Imputation and Validation of Missing AIS Grades in the Spinal Cord Injury Data Model Systems (SCIMS) Database

Daniel Lubelski, Timothy F. Witham, Carlos A. Aude, Tej D. Azad, Nicholas Theodore, Ali Bydon, Ritvik Jillala, Vikas N. Vattipally
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) at admission is an important predictor of outcomes following spinal cord injury (tSCI). Nearly 80% of records in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) database—a multicenter, prospective database of SCI patients—lack admission AIS grades. Accurate imputation of this missing data could enable more robust analyses and insights into SCI recovery. METHODS: We included 14,110 SCI patients from the SCIMS database (1988-2020). Five machine learning algorithms—Random Forest (RF), Linear Discriminant Analysis, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, and Support Vector Machines—were compared for imputation accuracy using 5-fold cross-validation. The highest accuracy model (RF) was applied to the entire dataset. We validated the imputed AIS grades by predicting discharge Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores (range 13-91) with simple and multiple linear regression models on a 1:1 propensity-score-matched cohort (n=5,828). Model performance was compared using differences in RMSE with bootstrapped confidence intervals. RESULTS: The full cohort contained a representative distribution of AIS grades (46.0% A, 14.7% B, 19.4% C, 19.8% D), and the propensity-matched cohort characteristics were well-balanced. RF demonstrated the highest validation accuracy, 81.7%. Predictive models showed no significant differences between models using true vs. imputed AIS grades, with the 95%CI for RMSE being [-0.18,0.85] for simple and [-0.28,0.77] for multiple regression models. The coefficients of AIS grades were not significantly different between models with true vs. imputed values. CONCLUSIONS: A data-driven approach to imputation resulted in a robust method for imputing admission AIS that demonstrates clinical validity in the SCIMS database. This approach extends the utility of this longitudinal database and, with validation, may provide a framework for other SCI databases.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.