1211 Stereotactic Radiosurgery is Highly Effective for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma Spinal Metastases

INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) spinal metastases are traditionally radioresistant to conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), leading to progression in pain and neurological deficit in patients who are refractory to treatment. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can deliver higher doses of radiation in fewer fractions which may overcome radioresistance. METHODS: From 2003-2023, 85 patients (122 lesions) undergoing SRS for RCC spinal metastases were analyzed. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were recorded, including treatment history, neurologic status, pain quality, dosimetry and fractionation schedule, local control (LC), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (31% female) with 122 lesions in the cervical (11%), thoracic (50%), lumbar (27%), and sacral (12%) spine were treated with SRS. The median patient age was 61 years (range:39-91). The median follow-up period was 8 months (range:1-125). Treatment was delivered in a median of 1 session (range:1-3) with a prescription dose of 20Gy (range:14-30) to a gross tumor volume of 37.4cc (range:0.8-208.2). Pain was reported to have improved or remained stable for 89% of lesions. Twenty-four lesions (20%) locally progressed. The 6-, 12-, and 18-month LC rates were 91%, 83%, and 76%, respectively. The median OS was 12.3 months. On multivariate analysis, prior EBRT was associated with worsened OS (HR:1.89, 95th CI:[1.05-3.40], p=0.035) and multi-session SRS was associated with improved OS (HR:0.45, 95th CI:[0.23-0.90], p=0.023). There were 8 (7%) instances of radiation-induced adverse effects [5 (4%) acute pain flares, 2 (1.6%) vertebral compression fractures, and 1 (0.8%) radiation proctitis]. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of conventional EBRT for RCC spinal metastases has been limited given the radioresistance of RCC. Spinal SRS is an effective alternative treatment modality that offers high rates of local tumor control and symptom relief for patients with RCC spinal metastases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_1211
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1211 Stereotactic Radiosurgery is Highly Effective for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma Spinal Metastases

Suchet Taori, Shovan Bhatia, Roberta K. Sefcik, Peter C. Gerszten et al.
Neurosurgery
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

1211 Stereotactic Radiosurgery is Highly Effective for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma Spinal Metastases

Suchet Taori, Shovan Bhatia, Roberta K. Sefcik, Peter C. Gerszten, Pascal O. Zinn, Samuel Adida, Michael R. Kann, John C. Flickinger, Steven A. Burton
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) spinal metastases are traditionally radioresistant to conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), leading to progression in pain and neurological deficit in patients who are refractory to treatment. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can deliver higher doses of radiation in fewer fractions which may overcome radioresistance. METHODS: From 2003-2023, 85 patients (122 lesions) undergoing SRS for RCC spinal metastases were analyzed. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were recorded, including treatment history, neurologic status, pain quality, dosimetry and fractionation schedule, local control (LC), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (31% female) with 122 lesions in the cervical (11%), thoracic (50%), lumbar (27%), and sacral (12%) spine were treated with SRS. The median patient age was 61 years (range:39-91). The median follow-up period was 8 months (range:1-125). Treatment was delivered in a median of 1 session (range:1-3) with a prescription dose of 20Gy (range:14-30) to a gross tumor volume of 37.4cc (range:0.8-208.2). Pain was reported to have improved or remained stable for 89% of lesions. Twenty-four lesions (20%) locally progressed. The 6-, 12-, and 18-month LC rates were 91%, 83%, and 76%, respectively. The median OS was 12.3 months. On multivariate analysis, prior EBRT was associated with worsened OS (HR:1.89, 95th CI:[1.05-3.40], p=0.035) and multi-session SRS was associated with improved OS (HR:0.45, 95th CI:[0.23-0.90], p=0.023). There were 8 (7%) instances of radiation-induced adverse effects [5 (4%) acute pain flares, 2 (1.6%) vertebral compression fractures, and 1 (0.8%) radiation proctitis]. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of conventional EBRT for RCC spinal metastases has been limited given the radioresistance of RCC. Spinal SRS is an effective alternative treatment modality that offers high rates of local tumor control and symptom relief for patients with RCC spinal metastases.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.