276 The Utility of Intravascular Ultrasound in Venous Sinus Stenting

INTRODUCTION: Venous sinus stenting (VSS) is an effective treatment for pulsatile tinnitus (PT) and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Patients are typically selected for intervention based on a combination of stenosis measurements on catheter angiography, which carries some degree of subjectivity, and awake intravascular manometry-based pressure gradients. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a uniquely advantageous tool in this setting: By capturing the luminal area of the irregular venous sinuses, IVUS provides objective stenosis measurements, which may be more reliable for VSS patient selection. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing venography with IVUS for assessment of venous sinus stenosis over an eight-month period. Angiographic and IVUS measurements of stenosis were compared to manometry pressure gradients. Two independent interventionalists measured angiographic stenosis; the average measurement was used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were included with either IIH (41.9%) or PT (58.1%). The average percent maximal venous sinus stenosis measured by conventional angiography was 51.2% and by IVUS was 65.2%. The interrater correlation of angiographic measurement of stenosis was relatively poor (r2=0.19, p=0.015*). IVUS stenosis measurements correlated with manometry gradients significantly better than angiographic measurements (Pearson’s r=0.78 vs 0.46, p=0.044*). IVUS stenosis of at least 53.2% predicted a manometry gradient =8, our clinical cutoff for stenting, with 100% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. No device-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: IVUS is a safe, reliable, and effective method for assessing venous sinus stenosis, outperforming conventional angiography in accurately measuring stenosis correlating to high intravenous pressure gradients. With its potential to establish a threshold percent stenosis responsive to VSS if investigated in a larger cohort, IVUS represents a promising tool for refining treatment criteria. Our findings advocate for the integration of IVUS into future VSS protocols to optimize patient selection.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_276
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

276 The Utility of Intravascular Ultrasound in Venous Sinus Stenting

Athos Patsalides, Kyriakos Papadimitriou, Daniel Toscano, Christian Ferriera et al.
Neurosurgery
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

276 The Utility of Intravascular Ultrasound in Venous Sinus Stenting

Athos Patsalides, Kyriakos Papadimitriou, Daniel Toscano, Christian Ferriera, Kevin Shah, Justin Turpin, Danielle Golub, Brianna M. Donnelly, Shyle H. Mehta, Timothy G. White
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Venous sinus stenting (VSS) is an effective treatment for pulsatile tinnitus (PT) and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Patients are typically selected for intervention based on a combination of stenosis measurements on catheter angiography, which carries some degree of subjectivity, and awake intravascular manometry-based pressure gradients. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a uniquely advantageous tool in this setting: By capturing the luminal area of the irregular venous sinuses, IVUS provides objective stenosis measurements, which may be more reliable for VSS patient selection. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing venography with IVUS for assessment of venous sinus stenosis over an eight-month period. Angiographic and IVUS measurements of stenosis were compared to manometry pressure gradients. Two independent interventionalists measured angiographic stenosis; the average measurement was used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were included with either IIH (41.9%) or PT (58.1%). The average percent maximal venous sinus stenosis measured by conventional angiography was 51.2% and by IVUS was 65.2%. The interrater correlation of angiographic measurement of stenosis was relatively poor (r2=0.19, p=0.015*). IVUS stenosis measurements correlated with manometry gradients significantly better than angiographic measurements (Pearson’s r=0.78 vs 0.46, p=0.044*). IVUS stenosis of at least 53.2% predicted a manometry gradient =8, our clinical cutoff for stenting, with 100% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. No device-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: IVUS is a safe, reliable, and effective method for assessing venous sinus stenosis, outperforming conventional angiography in accurately measuring stenosis correlating to high intravenous pressure gradients. With its potential to establish a threshold percent stenosis responsive to VSS if investigated in a larger cohort, IVUS represents a promising tool for refining treatment criteria. Our findings advocate for the integration of IVUS into future VSS protocols to optimize patient selection.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.