291 Machine Learning Predicts Spinal Cord Stimulation Responders Utilizing Preoperative Pain Scores and Patient Characteristics

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is a debilitating condition that impacts over 17 million people around the world. While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a promising therapy, patient selection remains challenging due to an inability to predict who will experience pain relief. METHODS: Patients who were scheduled for permanent SCS implant surgery for their chronic back and/or leg pain were recruited for the study. Pain outcome data (e.g., Numeric Rating Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale) were collected preoperatively and 3 months after surgery. Responders were defined as having a Global Improvement (GI) score =5 (scale: 0-10) within 3 months of implantation. We trained a suite of machine learning classifiers via nested leave-one-out cross validation to predict which patients will be responders using patient characteristics (e.g., age, diagnosis, medication) and preoperative pain scores. Results were averaged over 10 random seeds for robustness. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (age 64.5±11.7 years, 11 female) were included. The decision tree performed best, achieving accuracy and Cohen’s kappa of 81.88% and 0.6170, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) were 94.44%, 65.71%, 0.82 and 0.80, respectively. When examining the importance of features via a kernel-based estimation approach for Shapley values, the PCS Helpfulness score was the most important across all models trained, and the top five features were always pain scores rather than other demographics. CONCLUSIONS: We show that it’s possible to predict SCS responders before surgical implantation begins, offering an avenue to screen large numbers of chronic pain patients quickly and affordably to improve outcomes. Future work will incorporate EEG data, utilize composite pain scores to determine responders, and examine generalizability of our algorithm in larger datasets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_291
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

291 Machine Learning Predicts Spinal Cord Stimulation Responders Utilizing Preoperative Pain Scores and Patient Characteristics

Ilknur Telkes, Julie G. Pilitsis, Shelby Sabourin, Martina Valletta et al.
Neurosurgery
Pain Management and Treatment
article

291 Machine Learning Predicts Spinal Cord Stimulation Responders Utilizing Preoperative Pain Scores and Patient Characteristics

Ilknur Telkes, Julie G. Pilitsis, Shelby Sabourin, Martina Valletta, Olga Khazen, Jay Gopal
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is a debilitating condition that impacts over 17 million people around the world. While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a promising therapy, patient selection remains challenging due to an inability to predict who will experience pain relief. METHODS: Patients who were scheduled for permanent SCS implant surgery for their chronic back and/or leg pain were recruited for the study. Pain outcome data (e.g., Numeric Rating Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale) were collected preoperatively and 3 months after surgery. Responders were defined as having a Global Improvement (GI) score =5 (scale: 0-10) within 3 months of implantation. We trained a suite of machine learning classifiers via nested leave-one-out cross validation to predict which patients will be responders using patient characteristics (e.g., age, diagnosis, medication) and preoperative pain scores. Results were averaged over 10 random seeds for robustness. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (age 64.5±11.7 years, 11 female) were included. The decision tree performed best, achieving accuracy and Cohen’s kappa of 81.88% and 0.6170, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) were 94.44%, 65.71%, 0.82 and 0.80, respectively. When examining the importance of features via a kernel-based estimation approach for Shapley values, the PCS Helpfulness score was the most important across all models trained, and the top five features were always pain scores rather than other demographics. CONCLUSIONS: We show that it’s possible to predict SCS responders before surgical implantation begins, offering an avenue to screen large numbers of chronic pain patients quickly and affordably to improve outcomes. Future work will incorporate EEG data, utilize composite pain scores to determine responders, and examine generalizability of our algorithm in larger datasets.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.