1083 Assessing the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Managing Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) often leads to diabetic neuropathy (DN), particularly Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN), causing significant pain and discomfort. Despite available pharmacological treatments, many patients remain untreated or experience intolerable side effects. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was implemented through March 26, 2024, across five databases (PubMed, Scopus, WOS, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL), identifying studies relevant to SCC and PDN. Eligibility criteria included all clinical trials reporting teh safey and efficacy of SCS in PDN patients. The screening and data extraction were done by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias assessment was done by ROBINS-I or RoB 2.0 tool. Statistical analysis involved narrative synthesis and meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and leave-one-out analyses were performed. RESULTS: The mean difference (MD) in pain intensity between the SCS and best medical therapy (BMT) groups after six months was -4.82 (95% CI: [-6.42, -3.22], p < 0.00001), favoring the SCS group. Treatment success, defined as achieving =50% pain relief, was significantly higher in the SCS group with a risk difference (RD) of 0.59 (95% CI: [0.33, 0.85], p < 0.00001) compared to BMT group. Additionally, SCS led to a significant improvement in quality of life measures compared to BMT group, with an MD of 0.16 (95% CI: [0.10, 0.23], p < 0.00001) for EQ-5D utility index and an MD of 15.29 (95% CI: [4.51, 26.07], p = 0.005) for self-reported health. Adverse events related to SCS implantation were generally low. CONCLUSIONS: SCS shows promise as an effective treatment option for painful PDN, offering significant pain relief, improved treatment success, and enhanced quality of life. Despite some heterogeneity and limitations in the current evidence. Further high-quality trials, including comparisons between different SCS modalities, are recommended to validate these findings and optimize treatment approaches for painful PDN patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_1083
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1083 Assessing the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Managing Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Meta-Analysis

Ahmed Negida, Ahmad Samir, Ahmed M. Raslan, Mahmoud Tarek Hefnawy et al.
Neurosurgery
Pain Management and Treatment
article

1083 Assessing the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Managing Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Meta-Analysis

Ahmed Negida, Ahmad Samir, Ahmed M. Raslan, Mahmoud Tarek Hefnawy, Amna Hussein, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Amira Mohamed Taha, Mohamed Abdulhameed Hatem, Alaa M. Rashad, Mohamed El-Moslemani, Ali F. Bakr, Ahmed Diaa, Moaz Elsayed Abouelmagd, Abdallah Sebtan
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) often leads to diabetic neuropathy (DN), particularly Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN), causing significant pain and discomfort. Despite available pharmacological treatments, many patients remain untreated or experience intolerable side effects. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was implemented through March 26, 2024, across five databases (PubMed, Scopus, WOS, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL), identifying studies relevant to SCC and PDN. Eligibility criteria included all clinical trials reporting teh safey and efficacy of SCS in PDN patients. The screening and data extraction were done by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias assessment was done by ROBINS-I or RoB 2.0 tool. Statistical analysis involved narrative synthesis and meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and leave-one-out analyses were performed. RESULTS: The mean difference (MD) in pain intensity between the SCS and best medical therapy (BMT) groups after six months was -4.82 (95% CI: [-6.42, -3.22], p < 0.00001), favoring the SCS group. Treatment success, defined as achieving =50% pain relief, was significantly higher in the SCS group with a risk difference (RD) of 0.59 (95% CI: [0.33, 0.85], p < 0.00001) compared to BMT group. Additionally, SCS led to a significant improvement in quality of life measures compared to BMT group, with an MD of 0.16 (95% CI: [0.10, 0.23], p < 0.00001) for EQ-5D utility index and an MD of 15.29 (95% CI: [4.51, 26.07], p = 0.005) for self-reported health. Adverse events related to SCS implantation were generally low. CONCLUSIONS: SCS shows promise as an effective treatment option for painful PDN, offering significant pain relief, improved treatment success, and enhanced quality of life. Despite some heterogeneity and limitations in the current evidence. Further high-quality trials, including comparisons between different SCS modalities, are recommended to validate these findings and optimize treatment approaches for painful PDN patients.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.