1263 Internal Hematoma Architecture Predicts Subdural Hematoma Responsiveness to Upfront Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization

INTRODUCTION: Subdural hematoma (SDH) is quickly becoming the most common neurosurgical pathology due to the aging population. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has recently emerged as an effective adjunct to surgical SDH evacuation by decreasing recurrence risk. MMAE has also shown promise as a standalone SDH intervention, but clinical and radiographic predictors of successful MMAE remain ill-defined. METHODS: Retrospective review from 2020–2023 at a high-volume center identified all MMAE cases performed as primary SDH treatment. Subacute, chronic, or mixed density collections with less than a 50% acute component and minimal associated neurological symptoms were eligible. Cases were classified by hematoma internal architecture as homogeneous, separated, laminar, or trabecular (using the Nakaguchi classification). SDH maximal thickness was assessed on all follow-up imaging, and any SDH recurrences or expansions requiring surgical evacuation were denoted as treatment failures. RESULTS: 164 upfront MMAE cases were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 7.1 months. Most cases were in male patients (75.0%), and mean age was 73.2 years. The cases with laminar and trabecular collections were slightly larger than those with homogeneous and separated collections (16.2mm vs. 14.2mm, p=0.008*), but other baseline characteristics were similar. The overall MMAE failure rate was 6.7% with a 4.9% periprocedural complication rate. The MMAE failure rate was significantly lower in the laminar and trabecular subgroup (1.2%) compared to the homogeneous and separated subgroup (12.4%) (p=0.005*). Homogeneous and separated internal hematoma architecture was the only predictor of MMAE failure in multivariate analysis (OR 11.6, p=0.021*) and was also associated with delayed SDH resorption (Two-way ANOVA: F=4.8, p=0.0025*). CONCLUSIONS: Upfront MMAE is an effective, safe, and durable treatment for non-acute SDH, and is especially effective for hematomas with more membranous internal architecture.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_1263
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1263 Internal Hematoma Architecture Predicts Subdural Hematoma Responsiveness to Upfront Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization

Athos Patsalides, Amir R. Dehdashti, Kyriakos Papadimitriou, Miriam M. Shao et al.
1 citations
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
1.39
article

1263 Internal Hematoma Architecture Predicts Subdural Hematoma Responsiveness to Upfront Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization

Athos Patsalides, Amir R. Dehdashti, Kyriakos Papadimitriou, Miriam M. Shao, Thomas W. Link, Justin Turpin, Danielle Golub, Joshua D. McBriar, Brianna M. Donnelly, Roberto Kutcher-Diaz, Timothy G. White, Henry H. Woo, Tarika-Deep Virdi, Rebecca Ronnen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Subdural hematoma (SDH) is quickly becoming the most common neurosurgical pathology due to the aging population. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has recently emerged as an effective adjunct to surgical SDH evacuation by decreasing recurrence risk. MMAE has also shown promise as a standalone SDH intervention, but clinical and radiographic predictors of successful MMAE remain ill-defined. METHODS: Retrospective review from 2020–2023 at a high-volume center identified all MMAE cases performed as primary SDH treatment. Subacute, chronic, or mixed density collections with less than a 50% acute component and minimal associated neurological symptoms were eligible. Cases were classified by hematoma internal architecture as homogeneous, separated, laminar, or trabecular (using the Nakaguchi classification). SDH maximal thickness was assessed on all follow-up imaging, and any SDH recurrences or expansions requiring surgical evacuation were denoted as treatment failures. RESULTS: 164 upfront MMAE cases were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 7.1 months. Most cases were in male patients (75.0%), and mean age was 73.2 years. The cases with laminar and trabecular collections were slightly larger than those with homogeneous and separated collections (16.2mm vs. 14.2mm, p=0.008*), but other baseline characteristics were similar. The overall MMAE failure rate was 6.7% with a 4.9% periprocedural complication rate. The MMAE failure rate was significantly lower in the laminar and trabecular subgroup (1.2%) compared to the homogeneous and separated subgroup (12.4%) (p=0.005*). Homogeneous and separated internal hematoma architecture was the only predictor of MMAE failure in multivariate analysis (OR 11.6, p=0.021*) and was also associated with delayed SDH resorption (Two-way ANOVA: F=4.8, p=0.0025*). CONCLUSIONS: Upfront MMAE is an effective, safe, and durable treatment for non-acute SDH, and is especially effective for hematomas with more membranous internal architecture.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.