407 Screw Angle Variability in Posterior Cervical Fusions

INTRODUCTION: Variability in pedicle and lateral mass screw angle may influence biomechanical stability, fusion rates, and risk of implant-related complications following posterior cervical fusion (PCF). METHODS: Elective PCF patients from a single institution from 2010-22 were identified. Screw angles were collected using the screw midline and superior endplate. Independent variables were: a) standard deviation (SD) of angles among all screws, and b) mean difference between screw angles of adjacent screws. Outcomes included reoperations, radiographic evidence of implant failure, and PROs, including neck disability index (NDI%), neck and arm pain visual analogue score, and quality of life at 3, 12 and 24 months. Multivariable regression models were conducted controlling for age, BMI and smoking status. RESULTS: Among 367 patients undergoing PCF for degenerative cervical pathology, mean age was 62.2±10.2; 218 (59.4%) were male. The mean screw angle was 29.4±9.0º and follow-up, 4.1±3.4 years. Screw angle SD (p=0.763) and difference between adjacent screw angles (p=0.808) between patients were not associated with reoperation. Patients with radiographic evidence of implant failure (n=51, 13.9%) had greater screw angle SD (16.1±6.3 vs. 13.4±7.2º, p=.016) and difference between adjacent screw angles (10.6±4.3 vs. 8.5±5.0º, p=.003) than patients without implant failure. On cox-proportional hazard regression, screw angle SD (HR=1.04, 95% CI=1.00-1.08, p=.036) and difference between adjacent screw angles (HR=1.07, 95% CI=1.02-1.13, p=.008) increased the risk for implant failure. Screw angle SD (ρ=0.16, p=.004; β=0.39, 95% CI=0.13-0.66, p=.004) and difference in adjacent screw angles (ρ=0.13, p=.019; β=0.47, 95% CI=0.09-0.85, p=.016) were associated with increased 3-month NDI, with no association to other PROs. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of PCF patients, greater screw angle SD and difference between adjacent screw angles were associated with increased risk for implant failure and worse 3-month neck disability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_407
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

407 Screw Angle Variability in Posterior Cervical Fusions

Julian Lugo-Pico, Scott L. Zuckerman, Omar Zakieh, Raymond Joseph Gardocki et al.
Neurosurgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

407 Screw Angle Variability in Posterior Cervical Fusions

Julian Lugo-Pico, Scott L. Zuckerman, Omar Zakieh, Raymond Joseph Gardocki, Byron F. Stephens, Amir Mohamad Abtahi, Maryam Y. Jawid, Mason Shing Young, Mitchell Bowers, Naadir Jamal
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Variability in pedicle and lateral mass screw angle may influence biomechanical stability, fusion rates, and risk of implant-related complications following posterior cervical fusion (PCF). METHODS: Elective PCF patients from a single institution from 2010-22 were identified. Screw angles were collected using the screw midline and superior endplate. Independent variables were: a) standard deviation (SD) of angles among all screws, and b) mean difference between screw angles of adjacent screws. Outcomes included reoperations, radiographic evidence of implant failure, and PROs, including neck disability index (NDI%), neck and arm pain visual analogue score, and quality of life at 3, 12 and 24 months. Multivariable regression models were conducted controlling for age, BMI and smoking status. RESULTS: Among 367 patients undergoing PCF for degenerative cervical pathology, mean age was 62.2±10.2; 218 (59.4%) were male. The mean screw angle was 29.4±9.0º and follow-up, 4.1±3.4 years. Screw angle SD (p=0.763) and difference between adjacent screw angles (p=0.808) between patients were not associated with reoperation. Patients with radiographic evidence of implant failure (n=51, 13.9%) had greater screw angle SD (16.1±6.3 vs. 13.4±7.2º, p=.016) and difference between adjacent screw angles (10.6±4.3 vs. 8.5±5.0º, p=.003) than patients without implant failure. On cox-proportional hazard regression, screw angle SD (HR=1.04, 95% CI=1.00-1.08, p=.036) and difference between adjacent screw angles (HR=1.07, 95% CI=1.02-1.13, p=.008) increased the risk for implant failure. Screw angle SD (ρ=0.16, p=.004; β=0.39, 95% CI=0.13-0.66, p=.004) and difference in adjacent screw angles (ρ=0.13, p=.019; β=0.47, 95% CI=0.09-0.85, p=.016) were associated with increased 3-month NDI, with no association to other PROs. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of PCF patients, greater screw angle SD and difference between adjacent screw angles were associated with increased risk for implant failure and worse 3-month neck disability.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.