401 How do Classification Versus Regression Machine Learning Algorithms Predict 5-Year Minimum Clinically Important Differences in QOD Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Patients?

INTRODUCTION: Machine learning techniques able to parse high-dimensional clinical data are a promising avenue for optimized identification of ideal surgical candidates. The formulation of such medical prediction problems as classification or regression tasks can have significant effects on model performance. METHODS: Patients undergoing single-segment surgery were collected from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database Lumbar Spondylolisthesis dataset. Classification models were trained on 60-month achievement of minimum clinically important differences (MCID) for ODI, NRS-Back Pain, and NRS-Leg Pain. Equivalent regression models were trained on continuous variables of 60-month change in ODI, NRS-BP, and NRS-LP. Predicted values were converted to MCID achievement for model evaluation. All models were trained on an 80/20 split with 5-fold cross-validation, and Bayesian search was used for hyperparameter tuning. RESULTS: Our final cohort included 608 patients, with 487 completing 60-month follow-up. Of these patients, 304 (62.9%) reached MCID for ODI, 280 (66.2%) reached MCID for NRS-BP, and 322 (69.7%) reached MCID for NRS-LP. All models demonstrated highest predictive performance on MCID for NRS-LP tasks. The classification and regression models demonstrated largely equivalent AUC across prediction of MCID for NRS-LP (C:0.70±0.07to0.76±0.05, R:0.66±0.05to0.77±0.05), NRS-BP (C:0.63±0.06to0.72±0.07, R:0.67±0.07to0.69±0.07), and ODI (C:0.60±0.04to0.67±0.04, R:0.50±0.00to0.64±0.05). Notably, the MLP regressor outperformed all models on AUC for NRS-LP MCID prediction. For NRS-LP specifically, regression models consistently demonstrated higher accuracy, precision, F1, and recall metrics versus their classification counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort undergoing surgery for Grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, ML algorithms reliably predicted 5-year achievement of MCID across PROs. The equivalent and sometimes superior performance of regression models emphasizes the importance of thoughtful model selection and task formulation guided by clinical context.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_401
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

401 How do Classification Versus Regression Machine Learning Algorithms Predict 5-Year Minimum Clinically Important Differences in QOD Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Patients?

Erica F. Bisson, Mark E. Shaffrey, Jonathan R. Slotkin, Michael Y. Wang et al.
Neurosurgery
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

401 How do Classification Versus Regression Machine Learning Algorithms Predict 5-Year Minimum Clinically Important Differences in QOD Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Patients?

Erica F. Bisson, Mark E. Shaffrey, Jonathan R. Slotkin, Michael Y. Wang, Paul Park, Steven D. Glassman, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Mohamad Bydon, Mandeep S. Virk, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Anthony Asher, Kevin T. Foley, Eunice Yang, Domagoj Coric, Andrew K. Chan, Dean Chou, John J. Knightly, Eric A. Potts, Kai-Ming Fu, Emily Schonfeld, Regis W. Haid
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Machine learning techniques able to parse high-dimensional clinical data are a promising avenue for optimized identification of ideal surgical candidates. The formulation of such medical prediction problems as classification or regression tasks can have significant effects on model performance. METHODS: Patients undergoing single-segment surgery were collected from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database Lumbar Spondylolisthesis dataset. Classification models were trained on 60-month achievement of minimum clinically important differences (MCID) for ODI, NRS-Back Pain, and NRS-Leg Pain. Equivalent regression models were trained on continuous variables of 60-month change in ODI, NRS-BP, and NRS-LP. Predicted values were converted to MCID achievement for model evaluation. All models were trained on an 80/20 split with 5-fold cross-validation, and Bayesian search was used for hyperparameter tuning. RESULTS: Our final cohort included 608 patients, with 487 completing 60-month follow-up. Of these patients, 304 (62.9%) reached MCID for ODI, 280 (66.2%) reached MCID for NRS-BP, and 322 (69.7%) reached MCID for NRS-LP. All models demonstrated highest predictive performance on MCID for NRS-LP tasks. The classification and regression models demonstrated largely equivalent AUC across prediction of MCID for NRS-LP (C:0.70±0.07to0.76±0.05, R:0.66±0.05to0.77±0.05), NRS-BP (C:0.63±0.06to0.72±0.07, R:0.67±0.07to0.69±0.07), and ODI (C:0.60±0.04to0.67±0.04, R:0.50±0.00to0.64±0.05). Notably, the MLP regressor outperformed all models on AUC for NRS-LP MCID prediction. For NRS-LP specifically, regression models consistently demonstrated higher accuracy, precision, F1, and recall metrics versus their classification counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort undergoing surgery for Grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, ML algorithms reliably predicted 5-year achievement of MCID across PROs. The equivalent and sometimes superior performance of regression models emphasizes the importance of thoughtful model selection and task formulation guided by clinical context.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.