1022 Measuring Success in Distance Traveled: Examining the Unique Obstacles of Indigenous American Patients With Acute Neurosurgical Injuries

INTRODUCTION: Historically, Indigenous American (IA) populations have faced barriers to adequate healthcare. Although IA people experience higher rates of traumatic brain injury (TBI)-related mortality than other racial groups in the US, attributes of their neurosurgical care have not been evaluated. METHODS: Adults hospitalized for acute neurosurgical injuries in 2017-2022 were identified in this retrospective cross-sectional study at our Level 1 trauma center. We evaluated demographics, distance to care, and in-hospital/aftercare characteristics in a propensity-matched analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-four IA patients were identified upon admission to neurointensive care. Propensity score analysis matched 77 IA and 77 non-IA patients with similar inclusion criteria on demographics, medical comorbidities, and distance traveled to neurosurgical care. IA patients traveled longer distances for care (236.3 vs. 146.4 miles, p<.001), were more often direct admissions (35.1% vs. 0.0%), were more often transported via ambulance (72.7% vs. 57.1%) and less often via helicopter (20.8% vs. 41.6%), and came from a broader cross-section of states. Average time from injury to care was 6 hours (IQR 3.0, 9.4). In-hospital care did not differ between groups; however, IA patients were less often discharged to rehabilitation (2.6% vs. 14.3%, p=.009). IA in-hospital TBI-related mortality was 8.3%. Fewer follow-up visits were completed in IA than non-IA patients (40.2% vs. 90.0%, p<.001), despite more attempted contacts (66.7% vs. 30.6%, p<.001), with low telemedicine use in both groups (2.7% vs. 5.5%). IA status and distance traveled for care were independent predictors of unmet follow-up visits (OR 6.22 [95%CI 1.49-25.99, p=.012] and OR 12.34 [95%CI 1.19-127.99, p=.035], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Clear barriers to care were demonstrated for IA patients with acute neurosurgical injuries. Our findings indicate improvements are needed for this vulnerable population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003360_1022
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1022 Measuring Success in Distance Traveled: Examining the Unique Obstacles of Indigenous American Patients With Acute Neurosurgical Injuries

Kyril L. Cole, Ramesh Grandhi, Sarah T. Menacho, Matthew C. Findlay et al.
Neurosurgery
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

1022 Measuring Success in Distance Traveled: Examining the Unique Obstacles of Indigenous American Patients With Acute Neurosurgical Injuries

Kyril L. Cole, Ramesh Grandhi, Sarah T. Menacho, Matthew C. Findlay, Majid Khan, Janet Cortez, Samuel A. Tenhoeve
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Historically, Indigenous American (IA) populations have faced barriers to adequate healthcare. Although IA people experience higher rates of traumatic brain injury (TBI)-related mortality than other racial groups in the US, attributes of their neurosurgical care have not been evaluated. METHODS: Adults hospitalized for acute neurosurgical injuries in 2017-2022 were identified in this retrospective cross-sectional study at our Level 1 trauma center. We evaluated demographics, distance to care, and in-hospital/aftercare characteristics in a propensity-matched analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-four IA patients were identified upon admission to neurointensive care. Propensity score analysis matched 77 IA and 77 non-IA patients with similar inclusion criteria on demographics, medical comorbidities, and distance traveled to neurosurgical care. IA patients traveled longer distances for care (236.3 vs. 146.4 miles, p<.001), were more often direct admissions (35.1% vs. 0.0%), were more often transported via ambulance (72.7% vs. 57.1%) and less often via helicopter (20.8% vs. 41.6%), and came from a broader cross-section of states. Average time from injury to care was 6 hours (IQR 3.0, 9.4). In-hospital care did not differ between groups; however, IA patients were less often discharged to rehabilitation (2.6% vs. 14.3%, p=.009). IA in-hospital TBI-related mortality was 8.3%. Fewer follow-up visits were completed in IA than non-IA patients (40.2% vs. 90.0%, p<.001), despite more attempted contacts (66.7% vs. 30.6%, p<.001), with low telemedicine use in both groups (2.7% vs. 5.5%). IA status and distance traveled for care were independent predictors of unmet follow-up visits (OR 6.22 [95%CI 1.49-25.99, p=.012] and OR 12.34 [95%CI 1.19-127.99, p=.035], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Clear barriers to care were demonstrated for IA patients with acute neurosurgical injuries. Our findings indicate improvements are needed for this vulnerable population.

NeurosurgeryVol. 71(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.